From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LvGBZ-0004bK-7m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:26:45 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LvGBU-0004V8-LF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:26:44 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58552 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LvGBU-0004Ui-4z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:26:40 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.220.169]:52096) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LvGBT-0003nI-Pu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:26:40 -0400 Received: by fxm17 with SMTP id 17so1222901fxm.34 for ; Sat, 18 Apr 2009 12:26:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1240055669.12170.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1240055669.12170.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 22:26:38 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] kqemu: only compile kqemu.o if actually needed From: Blue Swirl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 4/18/09, Paul Bolle wrote: > kqemu.o is compiled even if kqemu support is disabled. This is useless > (kqemu.o should provide nothing that is actually used in that case) and > slightly confusing. So introduce CONFIG_KQEMU for optionally compiling > kqemu.o. > > Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle > --- > If this is accepted a next step could be to merge CONFIG_KQEMU and > USE_KQEMU. Thanks, applied. Merging those would be great.