From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LvvNZ-0003aW-1F for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:25:53 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LvvNU-0003Wp-0n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:25:52 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49639 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LvvNT-0003WX-PF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:25:47 -0400 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:55521) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LvvNT-0001Fo-DR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:25:47 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.220.169]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LvvNS-0002DI-Nk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:25:46 -0400 Received: by fxm17 with SMTP id 17so1801336fxm.34 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 08:25:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <49EC82FC.9060108@codemonkey.ws> References: <49EC82FC.9060108@codemonkey.ws> Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:25:45 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH, RFC] Add file describing rules for submitting patches From: Blue Swirl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 4/20/09, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Blue Swirl wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > I gathered a few common complaints about patch submission, hopefully > > not too much affected by my consumption of small amounts of various > > alcoholic substances. > > > > Comments, objections? > > +SP2.5: Exception: For extremely short and trivial patches (one-line > > +fixes etc.), the description and "Signed-off-by:" lines may be > > +omitted, in which case the subject must be appended with the > > +submitter's name in parenthesis > > > > Signed-off-by can never be omitted--even for one line fixes. I disagree. Changes that are small enough do not create any copyrightable material, thus they may come from any source.