From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lx5PZ-0005pQ-6T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:20:45 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lx5PY-0005p5-KI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:20:44 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50555 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lx5PY-0005p0-Gq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:20:44 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.157]:7154) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lx5PY-0002b9-3z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:20:44 -0400 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e21so61310fga.8 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:20:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <49F0C898.5030600@codemonkey.ws> References: <20090423185308.GH3795@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <20090423191040.GI3795@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <5d6222a80904231215p62c6594asc50230b252e892aa@mail.gmail.com> <49F0C898.5030600@codemonkey.ws> Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:20:42 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [7234] Use a more natural order From: Blue Swirl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Glauber Costa , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Lennart Sorensen On 4/23/09, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Blue Swirl wrote: > > > On 4/23/09, Glauber Costa wrote: > > In this case he committed the patches even though I had pointed out > > these few remaining instances of this style. Gerd had fixed most of > > the issues on previous rounds but some were still left. > > > > > > With the expectation that they were going to get fixed after commit. It's > very hard to maintain large patch series outside of the tree. Since they > tend to sit on the list, merging often requires fix ups. In svn, this is a > total pain. Also in my view the remaining issues were not blocking the commit or worth a new round of patches, I was referring to Glauber's "all patches to list" proposal.