From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LyUM2-0005dr-Gd
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:10:54 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LyUM2-0005db-5f
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:10:54 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42906 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LyUM1-0005dY-WA
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:10:54 -0400
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.159]:6267)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <blauwirbel@gmail.com>) id 1LyUM1-0004gn-M5
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:10:53 -0400
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l27so584469fgb.8
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:10:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1240825023-869-1-git-send-email-gingold@adacore.com>
References: <1240825023-869-1-git-send-email-gingold@adacore.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:10:52 +0300
Message-ID: <f43fc5580904271010n45d130f3w330609cff7e12af8@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix powerpc 604 reset vector
From: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 4/27/09, Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com> wrote:
> According to 604eUM_book (see 8.3.3 Reset inputs p8-54), the IP bit is set
>  for hreset and the vector is at offset 0x100 from the exception prefix.
>
>  No difference in this area between 604 and 604e.

This breaks system_reset. Maybe the excp_prefix should be reset to
original value on reset?