From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M3a78-0007q9-QU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2009 14:20:34 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M3a74-0007pM-8T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2009 14:20:34 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40479 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M3a73-0007pG-UG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2009 14:20:29 -0400 Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.134.190]:20214) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M3a73-0006Jf-6d for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2009 14:20:29 -0400 Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g7so1070737muf.2 for ; Mon, 11 May 2009 11:20:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <200905111259.06181.brad@comstyle.com> References: <200904100821.10439.brad@comstyle.com> <200905111259.06181.brad@comstyle.com> Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 21:20:28 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU TCG code does not build with OpenBSD PowerPC From: Blue Swirl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Brad Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 5/11/09, Brad wrote: > On Monday 11 May 2009 11:30:09 Blue Swirl wrote: > > On 5/11/09, malc wrote: > > > On Sun, 10 May 2009, Brad wrote: > > > > On Sunday 10 May 2009 14:41:13 malc wrote: > > > > > On Sat, 9 May 2009, Brad wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 10:58:06AM +0400, malc wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, 10 Apr 2009, Brad wrote: > > > > > > [..snip..] > > > > > > > > You tested this and it works? > > > > > > > > Its a moot point if it "works" since QEMU 0.10.x is broken on all > > > > archs we had working with 0.9.x and QEMU 0.10.x is far from building > > > > as is. > > > > > > > > So my first priority is to get it to even build properly on the archs > > > > we supported with our 0.9.x port (amd64 i386 powerpc). > > > > > > I see. I was under impression that Blue Swirl was building it > > > successfully on (at least) OpenBSD not so long ago. How is it broken? > > > > QEMU works on OpenBSD/Sparc64 (at least sparc-softmmu is fine, other > > targets I tested do not work well), and OpenBSD/Sparc32 did build at > > some point. I had problems installing OpenBSD/i386 under QEMU, so I > > haven't tested that. > > > And that's the problem. You tested the arch no one uses with QEMU (so far) > instead of what is actually being used and the 0.10.x releases still don't > even build there either. Well, the only real machine I have with OpenBSD is Sparc64 and OpenBSD/x86 did not want install under QEMU.