From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M7XMS-0007aq-75 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2009 12:12:44 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M7XMO-0007Z3-0U for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2009 12:12:43 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59917 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M7XMN-0007Yz-Ej for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2009 12:12:39 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f219.google.com ([209.85.220.219]:33120) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M7XMN-0003Fy-2N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2009 12:12:39 -0400 Received: by fxm19 with SMTP id 19so1644888fxm.34 for ; Fri, 22 May 2009 09:12:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4A16C941.3070900@codemonkey.ws> References: <200905221304.53279.paul@codesourcery.com> <4A16A38A.40800@codemonkey.ws> <200905221415.40621.paul@codesourcery.com> <4A16C941.3070900@codemonkey.ws> Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 19:12:37 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Windows runtime error From: Blue Swirl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Consul , Paul Brook , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 5/22/09, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Paul Brook wrote: > > > On Friday 22 May 2009, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > > > > > > Paul Brook wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Don't use whole-archive for hwlib or libqemu objects > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hwlib definitely needs whole-archive. > > > > > > > > > > Why did this break arm-softmmu? It builds fine for me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In function `fdctrl_stop_transfer': > > > > fdc.c:1086: undefined reference to `DMA_release_DREQ' > > > > > > > > There appears to be a missing dependency somewhere, I suspect libhw*.a > > > > doesn't get rebuilt when you move objects from Makefile.target to > > > > Makefile.hw. > > > > > > > > > > > So a fresh rebuild "fixes" the problem? > > > > > > > > > > No, sorry, I mean occasionally you end up with a stale libhw.a. > > > > > > > > > Blue, can you revert this commit then? > > > > > > > > > > Both this (whole-archive) and the preceding fdc change need to be > reverted. > > > > > > I've reverted the whole-archive change and the fdc. I've left scsi intact. > They were blocking my testing of other patches. > > Everything now links and seems to work. Good for you. Should I then revert the qdev commit that broke pcnet (9d07d7579bcaf01e05c511c63d091ed2ac310091), because now Sparc crashes immediately when network is used?