qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] remove unused field from pci device.
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 20:40:29 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f43fc5580906081040w47fa900bi909f1f1a05ea03fa@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090608173625.GJ5558@redhat.com>

On 6/8/09, Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 08:31:09PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
>  > On 6/8/09, Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> wrote:
>  > > Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
>  > >  diff --git a/hw/pci.c b/hw/pci.c
>  > >  index 0ab5b94..02b335f 100644
>  > >  --- a/hw/pci.c
>  > >  +++ b/hw/pci.c
>  > >  @@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ static PCIDevice *do_pci_register_device(PCIDevice *pci_dev, PCIBus *bus,
>  > >          config_write = pci_default_write_config;
>  > >      pci_dev->config_read = config_read;
>  > >      pci_dev->config_write = config_write;
>  > >  -    pci_dev->irq_index = pci_irq_index++;
>  > >  +    pci_irq_index++;
>  > >      bus->devices[devfn] = pci_dev;
>  > >      pci_dev->irq = qemu_allocate_irqs(pci_set_irq, pci_dev, 4);
>  > >      return pci_dev;
>  > >  diff --git a/hw/pci.h b/hw/pci.h
>  > >  index 0405837..fb7b89a 100644
>  > >  --- a/hw/pci.h
>  > >  +++ b/hw/pci.h
>  > >  @@ -154,8 +154,6 @@ struct PCIDevice {
>  > >      PCIConfigReadFunc *config_read;
>  > >      PCIConfigWriteFunc *config_write;
>  > >      PCIUnregisterFunc *unregister;
>  > >  -    /* ??? This is a PC-specific hack, and should be removed.  */
>  > >  -    int irq_index;
>  > >
>  > >      /* IRQ objects for the INTA-INTD pins.  */
>  > >      qemu_irq *irq;
>  >
>  > After the patch, pci_irq_index no longer tracks irqs but how many PCI
>  > devices there are in the system, so perhaps it should be renamed as
>  > well.
>
> pci_irq_index tracked the number of PCI devices before this patch too
>  since irq_index is unused anyway. Do you want me to resend the patch
>  with renaming or do renaming in separate patch?

I guess it does not affect bisectability if you also do renaming in
the same patch.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-08 17:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-08 12:02 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] remove unused field from pci device Gleb Natapov
2009-06-08 17:31 ` Blue Swirl
2009-06-08 17:36   ` Gleb Natapov
2009-06-08 17:40     ` Blue Swirl [this message]
2009-06-09  2:59 ` Isaku Yamahata

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f43fc5580906081040w47fa900bi909f1f1a05ea03fa@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).