From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MGbvc-0005fU-0m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:54:32 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MGbvX-0005UE-R0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:54:31 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36624 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MGbvX-0005Tq-NQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:54:27 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f209.google.com ([209.85.220.209]:48560) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MGbvX-0008TA-69 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:54:27 -0400 Received: by fxm5 with SMTP id 5so1497809fxm.34 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:54:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20090616152050.GD782@redhat.com> References: <20090611084808.GA19508@redhat.com> <20090615170201.GA3964@redhat.com> <200906151856.28009.paul@codesourcery.com> <20090615181622.GA782@redhat.com> <20090615193054.GB782@redhat.com> <20090615200552.GC782@redhat.com> <20090616152050.GD782@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:54:25 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Register uhci_reset() callback. From: Blue Swirl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gleb Natapov Cc: Avi Kivity , Paul Brook , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 6/16/09, Gleb Natapov wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 06:14:51PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote: > > > Because interrupt line is stuck a guest can't get to the point where it > > > loads a driver to the second device. For outside observer the guest > > > just hangs. > > > > I see. The problem is in piix_pci interrupt handling, pci_irq_levels[] > > should be set to zero on reset. > > The patch that does that was rejected earlier :) > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2009-06/msg00342.html > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2009-06/msg00344.html I think patch 2/3 is bogus, but 3/3 should be the correct way. Nobody commented on that.