From: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: "G 3" <programmingkidx@gmail.com>,
"Andreas Färber" <andreas.faerber@web.de>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] cocoa.m issues fixed
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 21:07:06 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f43fc5580906211107l6654103bu98c728ad2bbaadbe@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A3E5071.7080407@redhat.com>
On 6/21/09, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 06/21/2009 05:06 PM, G 3 wrote:
>
> >
> > On Jun 21, 2009, at 6:10 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Am 21.06.2009 um 03:19 schrieb G 3:
> > >
> > >
> > > > +int cocoa_keycode_to_qemu(int keycode);
> > > > +
> > > >
> > >
> > > This seems unrelated. I believe you're trying to suppress a warning I've
> been seeing on 10.5 as well - if so, please provide that as a separate patch
> with appropriate description.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > This function prototype would eliminate this warning:
> > cocoa.m:233: warning: no previous prototype for `cocoa_keycode_to_qemu'
> >
> > Why a separate patch. Why not kill two birds with one stone?
> >
>
> It's standard operating procedure. Suppose in addition to the two birds
> you mention the patch also kills an innocent kitten. Since it's one patch,
> if a fix is not immediately forthcoming, the maintainer has to revert the
> patch, bringing both birds back to life.
How nasty for you to forget the poor little kitten, who should be
entitled to get her life back.
> With one patch per bird, the maintainer can revert just the patch which
> killed the kitten, leaving the other bird dead.
Also here, do you really hate kittens that much? ;-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-21 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-21 1:19 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] cocoa.m issues fixed G 3
2009-06-21 10:10 ` Andreas Färber
2009-06-21 14:06 ` G 3
2009-06-21 15:23 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-21 18:07 ` Blue Swirl [this message]
2009-06-21 18:16 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-22 17:05 ` Stuart Brady
2009-06-22 17:35 ` Blue Swirl
2009-06-22 18:47 ` Stuart Brady
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f43fc5580906211107l6654103bu98c728ad2bbaadbe@mail.gmail.com \
--to=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
--cc=andreas.faerber@web.de \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=programmingkidx@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).