From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MJ95S-0007UC-Aq
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:43:10 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MJ95P-0007S6-7R
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:43:07 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34560 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MJ95O-0007Rq-PU
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:43:06 -0400
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.158]:16565)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <blauwirbel@gmail.com>) id 1MJ95O-0002y9-AG
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:43:06 -0400
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l27so908539fgb.8
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 09:43:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <m37hz26hle.fsf@neno.mitica>
References: <cover.1245764569.git.quintela@redhat.com>
	<fa67d04a4c3ff2c893ea418c054c07ea3703e686.1245764569.git.quintela@redhat.com>
	<f43fc5580906230919m318000c0m77ca11dac2bf23b3@mail.gmail.com>
	<m37hz26hle.fsf@neno.mitica>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:43:05 +0300
Message-ID: <f43fc5580906230943g32099b6bg58e1c37908ecbe5c@mail.gmail.com>
From: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 11/15] sd flash is only used in arm devices
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 6/23/09, Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com> wrote:
> Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com> wrote:
>  > On 6/23/09, quintela@redhat.com <quintela@redhat.com> wrote:
>  >> From: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
>  >
>  > While $SUBJECT may be true, the patch still goes to wrong direction.
>  > The long term goal is to have a single binary for all systems. This
>  > means that devices should get more generic and not be tied to some
>  > systems.
>
>
> What do you prefer then, a config option that get only enabled for each
>  arch when it is needed?
>
>  Something like ARCH_HAS_SD=0|1
>
>  and then have the sd.o file in a single place on the Makefile.

Or CONFIG_SD, defined only if needed.

>  What we are searching here is to be able to compile-out functionality
>  that we are not interested in.  This RFC was related about how people
>  preffer it implemented.

Sounds like we'd get faster builds when building only a few targets, nice.