From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MMQT0-0003n4-1V
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:53:02 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MMQSz-0003ma-4u
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:53:01 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41117 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MMQSy-0003mP-V3
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:53:00 -0400
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.159]:16869)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <blauwirbel@gmail.com>) id 1MMQSy-0007Xx-G2
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:53:00 -0400
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l27so1261280fgb.8
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:52:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1246478901-6623-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de>
References: <1246478901-6623-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 20:52:59 +0300
Message-ID: <f43fc5580907021052i263a2b0fpbdb1ea7c4cd3173@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Replace signrom with shell script v3
From: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 7/1/09, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> wrote:
> In order to not execute code we just compiled, let's replace signrom
>  with a shell script that does the same thing while staying compatible
>  to pretty much every system available.
>
>  This should make cross-compilation for windows easier.

Why don't you use $(HOST_CC) to compile the signrom binary?