From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MQN36-0003ZC-81 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:02:36 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MQN30-0003Va-Fa for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:02:35 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59312 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MQN30-0003VM-14 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:02:30 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f211.google.com ([209.85.220.211]:55152) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MQN2z-0003mb-Fk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:02:29 -0400 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so1948858fxm.34 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:02:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1247490790-15783-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> References: <1247490790-15783-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:02:28 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/7] qdev: property fixups. From: Blue Swirl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 7/13/09, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Hi, > > Oops, v1 was incomplete, missing some tcx bits and eccmemctl, > here is a respin. Sorry for the noise. > > > Rebased my qdev patches. Figured build broke. BlueSwirl converted a > few devices to qdev, using the old property implementation. This patch > series fixes it up. Done as incremental as anthony has my qdev patches > already in his queue. Changes: > > * adds 16bit integer property. > * adds target_phys_addr_t property (separate source+header to not drag > the target_phys_addr_t dependeny into everything which includes > qdev.h). > * switch over m48t59 and tcx to the new property implementation. > > This is purely to fixup the build, the type checking issues raised by > Paul are not (yet) addressed. Will look into this later today. At least the m48t59, tcx and eccmemctl bits look fine.