From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MqY0f-0004sV-4m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:00:17 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MqY0Z-0004l7-Sp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:00:15 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52095 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MqY0Z-0004kx-Ea for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:00:11 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f214.google.com ([209.85.220.214]:57832) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MqY0Y-0000gZ-V9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:00:11 -0400 Received: by fxm10 with SMTP id 10so913414fxm.8 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:00:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20090923191340.GB18947@redhat.com> References: <20090923125818.GA13875@redhat.com> <4ABA62D0.2060205@codemonkey.ws> <20090923184041.GA18947@redhat.com> <20090923191340.GB18947@redhat.com> From: Blue Swirl Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 22:59:50 +0300 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: comments on: get page size in device init List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote= : > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:03:26PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 9:40 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wro= te: >> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 01:02:56PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> >> Blue Swirl wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin = wrote: >> >>> >> >>>>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Compile msix only once >> >>>>> >> >>>>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Get page size in device init. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl >> >>>>> >> >>>> What was the motivation for the page size change? >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> "Compile msix only once" >> >>> >> >>> >> >>>> It seems the only user passes TARGET_PAGE_SIZE anyway, >> >>>> using a constant seems clearer and probably generates >> >>>> less code. No? >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> Yes, but then the code would depend on TARGET_PAGE_SIZE, making it >> >>> impossible to compile the code only once. >> >>> >> >> >> >> We could probably get away with doing >> >> >> >> #define TARGET_PAGE_SIZE target_get_page_size() >> >> >> >> And take care of a big chunk of this without passing page size >> >> parameters around. >> > >> > >> > Sounds good. >> >> That would work and target_get_page_size() together with >> get_ram_size() would also handle the virtio case nicely, except for >> the if (!kvm_enabled() || kvm_has_sync_mmu()) part. > > Where's get_ram_size needed? In virtio-balloon.