From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N8HIz-0003AK-3d for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:48:29 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N8HIt-000331-Lm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:48:28 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53737 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N8HIt-00032s-Gj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:48:23 -0500 Received: from mail-yw0-f176.google.com ([209.85.211.176]:41182) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N8HIt-0005Gm-45 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:48:23 -0500 Received: by ywh6 with SMTP id 6so1153007ywh.4 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:48:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20091110205040.GF9052@hall.aurel32.net> From: Blue Swirl Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:47:57 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: arm, mips and mipsel broken List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Juan Quintela Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Aurelien Jarno On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Juan Quintela wrote: > Blue Swirl wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >>> Please note that at least qemu-system-arm, qemu-system-mips and >>> qemu-system-mipsel are broken by this commit: >> >> Given that none of the devices touched by the commit should be used by >> these targets, the breakage comes from just the single new call to >> qemu_system_reset in vl.c. This means that the reset functions for >> those boards and devices must be awfully buggy. >> >> I think the easiest solution is to surround the call by >> #if defined(TARGET_I386) || defined(TARGET_PPC) || defined(TARGET_SPARC) >> #endif >> until the devices have been fixed. > > That call also breaks loadvm from the command line on x86_64. > If I revert the rest of the patch except that line, I still get breakage > on rtl8139. Sigh. I'll leave only Sparc for now. Sorry for the trouble.