From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1N8Hd4-0005KP-8A
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:09:14 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1N8Hcz-0005E5-CJ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:09:13 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55906 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N8Hcz-0005Dq-1f
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:09:09 -0500
Received: from mail-gx0-f223.google.com ([209.85.217.223]:53854)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <blauwirbel@gmail.com>) id 1N8Hcy-0008RF-P5
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:09:08 -0500
Received: by gxk23 with SMTP id 23so1476811gxk.2
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:09:08 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <f43fc5580911110947n1a5a3148y4453c0aadb4a81e7@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20091110205040.GF9052@hall.aurel32.net>
	<f43fc5580911101319k612647eah7e5fbceec1278b10@mail.gmail.com>
	<m3r5s6ndg2.fsf@neno.mitica>
	<f43fc5580911110947n1a5a3148y4453c0aadb4a81e7@mail.gmail.com>
From: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:08:48 +0200
Message-ID: <f43fc5580911111008k282a7c9es5f067fdf453a3b8b@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: arm, mips and mipsel broken
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Juan Quintela <quintela@trasno.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 7:47 PM, Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Juan Quintela <quintela@trasno.org> wrote:
>> Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net> wrote:
>>>> Please note that at least qemu-system-arm, qemu-system-mips and
>>>> qemu-system-mipsel are broken by this commit:
>>>
>>> Given that none of the devices touched by the commit should be used by
>>> these targets, the breakage comes from just the single new call to
>>> qemu_system_reset in vl.c. This means that the reset functions for
>>> those boards and devices must be awfully buggy.
>>>
>>> I think the easiest solution is to surround the call by
>>> #if defined(TARGET_I386) || defined(TARGET_PPC) || defined(TARGET_SPARC)
>>> #endif
>>> until the devices have been fixed.
>>
>> That call also breaks loadvm from the command line on x86_64.
>> If I revert the rest of the patch except that line, I still get breakage
>> on rtl8139.
>
> Sigh. I'll leave only Sparc for now. Sorry for the trouble.
>

In fact it's easier to revert all commits and commit later one
architecture at a time.