From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N8KKn-0006zM-EV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:02:33 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N8KKi-0006sF-RC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:02:32 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48597 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N8KKh-0006rU-7P for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:02:27 -0500 Received: from mail-yw0-f176.google.com ([209.85.211.176]:58289) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N8KKe-0003nR-4N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:02:25 -0500 Received: by ywh6 with SMTP id 6so1336446ywh.4 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:02:23 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <200911111828.03660.paul@codesourcery.com> References: <20091110205040.GF9052@hall.aurel32.net> <20091110213538.GG9052@hall.aurel32.net> <200911111828.03660.paul@codesourcery.com> From: Blue Swirl Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:02:03 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] arm, mips and mipsel broken Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paul Brook Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Aurelien Jarno On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Paul Brook wrote: > On Tuesday 10 November 2009, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:19:40PM +0200, Blue Swirl wrote: >> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Aurelien Jarno > wrote: >> > > Please note that at least qemu-system-arm, qemu-system-mips and >> > > qemu-system-mipsel are broken by this commit: >> > >> > Given that none of the devices touched by the commit should be used by >> > these targets, the breakage comes from just the single new call to >> > qemu_system_reset in vl.c. This means that the reset functions for >> > those boards and devices must be awfully buggy. >> >> I'll try to have a closer look at the problem tomorrow, if I can't find >> the problem, it's what I'll commit. > > This is latent breakage introduced by 45a50b1. > See commits 97fe84f5 (makes breakage obvious) and f2d7497 (fixed ARM). > MIPS still needs fixing. I can't find 97fe84f5 or f2d7497, what commits are those?