qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Unclear committer situation
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 19:21:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f43fc5580912011121g34e41d0ckc240f8425c1f59bb@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B1565AD.10503@codemonkey.ws>

On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> wrote:
> Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Could someone with commit rights please stand up to feel responsible for
>> PPC?
>>
>> Usually, when I send a patch to qemu-devel, I know who to address to
>> increase chances of it getting committed. For kvm/vnc/block I just CC
>> Anthony, for Audio I just CC malc, etc.
>>
>> There are some subsystems where nobody feels responsible though,
>> apparently hoping 'someone else' will tske on it. Well, turns out it doesn't
>> work that way.
>
> The general problem is that someone has to step up to maintain these
> subsystems.  For some of them, there just isn't really a lot of interest.

Getting a decent test setup for each architecture is a bit of work too.

>> So could we please assign a committer for every subsystem around? Even if
>> the committer doesn't know the architecture inside out, it's still valuable
>> to have soneone feel responsible at all. Committer and maintainer also don't
>> have to be the same person. I'll gladly maintain S390 without having commit
>> rights - as long as I have someone to CC and know the patches will get
>> merged.
>
> git pulls have been working really well for linux-user.  I'd like to
> continue that for new architectures.
>
>> Of course, my main unclear subsystems are PPC and S390.
>>
>> I'd recommend the following committers:
>>
>> PPC: Blue Swirl
>> S390: Aurelien
>>
>> If you have other subsystems you feel uncertain on responsibilities,
>> please add them to the list incl. committer recommendation.
>
> PPC is tough because we lost our previous maintainer.  It's generally in
> pretty bad shape.  No one really has stepped up to seriously improve it
> either.

The design approach was often different from other architectures,
which makes things like qdev conversion less trivial (see macio.c).
Otherwise IMHO the situation has improved a lot, we even have a
working BIOS. Only PREP has rotten.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-12-01 19:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-01 11:47 [Qemu-devel] Unclear committer situation Alexander Graf
2009-12-01 18:51 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-12-01 19:21   ` Blue Swirl [this message]
2009-12-01 21:08     ` Anthony Liguori
2009-12-01 22:49   ` Alexander Graf
2009-12-02 11:18     ` andrzej zaborowski
2009-12-02 11:24       ` Alexander Graf
2009-12-02 12:38         ` Avi Kivity
2009-12-02 11:31   ` Riku Voipio
2009-12-03 14:04     ` Anthony Liguori
2009-12-02  8:26 ` Aurelien Jarno
2009-12-02  8:37   ` Alexander Graf
2009-12-02  8:46     ` Aurelien Jarno
2009-12-02  8:54       ` Alexander Graf
2009-12-02 21:09         ` Jan-Simon Möller
2009-12-02  9:08     ` Avi Kivity
2009-12-02  8:45   ` malc
2009-12-02 15:33 ` Artyom Tarasenko
2009-12-02 18:31   ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2009-12-02 18:48     ` Artyom Tarasenko
2009-12-03 10:20       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-03 13:10         ` andrzej zaborowski
2009-12-02 21:18     ` Anthony Liguori
2009-12-03 10:07       ` Artyom Tarasenko
2009-12-02 18:40   ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2009-12-02 18:53     ` Artyom Tarasenko
2009-12-02 18:56       ` Alexander Graf
2009-12-03  9:44         ` Filip Navara
2009-12-03 14:19           ` Anthony Liguori
2009-12-02 19:12       ` Anthony Liguori
2009-12-03  9:20         ` Riku Voipio
2009-12-03 12:56         ` Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2009-12-03 14:40           ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-05  0:25 ` [Qemu-devel] " Isaku Yamahata

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f43fc5580912011121g34e41d0ckc240f8425c1f59bb@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).