From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NW50u-00083n-Va for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2010 04:32:13 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NW50p-000801-0W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2010 04:32:11 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54104 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NW50o-0007zr-RT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2010 04:32:06 -0500 Received: from mail-pw0-f43.google.com ([209.85.160.43]:47135) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NW50o-0006sU-CJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2010 04:32:06 -0500 Received: by pwj11 with SMTP id 11so872909pwj.2 for ; Sat, 16 Jan 2010 01:32:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1263595050-17791-1-git-send-email-atar4qemu@google.com> From: Blue Swirl Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 09:31:45 +0000 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: sparc32 do not clear interrupts when masking List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Artyom Tarasenko Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Artyom Tarasenko On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Blue Swirl wrote: > On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Blue Swirl wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Blue Swirl wrote= : >>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Artyom Tarasenko >>> wrote: >>>> Don't clear interrupts on disabling, because >>>> * Sun4M_SystemArchitecture_edited2.pdf doesn't describe >>>> =C2=A0that masking or un-masking IRQ shall clear pending ones. >>>> >>>> * Field tests also show that SPARCstation-20 doesn't >>>> =C2=A0clear them. >>> >>> Awesome work! >>> >>>> * The patch makes Solaris 2.5.1/2.6 boot ~1500 times >>>> =C2=A0faster (~20 seconds instead of ~8 hours) >>> >>> Unfortunately there is some problem with the patch (or more likely >>> there is some other bug that this uncovers), because all my Linux test >>> now panic. NetBSD and OpenBSD are unaffected. >>> >>> For example, sparc-test: >>> eth0: LANCE 52:54:00:12:34:56 >>> esp0: no command in esp_handle() >>> Kernel panic - not syncing: esp_handle: current_SC =3D=3D penguin withi= n interrupt! >>> =C2=A0<0>Press L1-A to return to the boot prom >>> >>> The bug may be in ESP interrupt handling (or in the interrupt chain >>> between ESP, DMA controller and interrupt controller) as the panic >>> always happens in ESP probe. >> >> In fact the bug was that OpenBIOS didn't clear ESP interrupts after >> issuing commands, so the IRQ line was left raised which confused >> Linux. >> > > Thanks, applied. I fixed the OpenBIOS bug and updated images in pc-bios. > Except that I'm idiot and commit the wrong fix.