From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NilxX-0007D7-6i
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 04:49:11 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60500 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NilxW-0007Cv-N2
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 04:49:10 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim
	4.60) (envelope-from <blauwirbel@gmail.com>) id 1NilxW-0004BW-1u
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 04:49:10 -0500
Received: from mail-pw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.160.45]:51939)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <blauwirbel@gmail.com>) id 1NilxV-0004BN-Po
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 04:49:09 -0500
Received: by pwi4 with SMTP id 4so857029pwi.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 01:49:08 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ee2e06e91002200143g120c3d04jbe61e4e11e66804@mail.gmail.com>
References: <ee2e06e91002191024rc2914eeia8a772e2e096f8cb@mail.gmail.com>
	<f43fc5581002200056h3b898e13xab4521fa311d2bdb@mail.gmail.com>
	<ee2e06e91002200143g120c3d04jbe61e4e11e66804@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 11:49:08 +0200
Message-ID: <f43fc5581002200149x16ed109o6db9d4d804fd8b36@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-sparc: fix --enable-debug build
From: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Jay Foad <jay.foad@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 2/20/10, Jay Foad <jay.foad@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Yes, except for the Signed-off-by: line.
>
>
> Do I need to resend it for that? And if so, does that make it PATCH v2
>  (even though the patch hasn't changed)?
>
>  Or can I just put the fixed Signed-off-by: line in a reply?

I'd suppose you'd also want to trim the commit message to remove the
question, so please send a new patch.