From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NsioJ-00033C-BI
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:28:47 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60649 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NsioI-00032u-UE
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:28:46 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim
	4.60) (envelope-from <blauwirbel@gmail.com>) id 1NsioI-0002WE-8C
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:28:46 -0400
Received: from mail-pw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.160.45]:39043)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <blauwirbel@gmail.com>) id 1NsioH-0002W2-Rk
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:28:46 -0400
Received: by pwi9 with SMTP id 9so2420277pwi.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:28:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20100319020302.GE14108@shareable.org>
References: <f43fc5581003130656j408f64bfp7fe4bf486c625624@mail.gmail.com>
	<m3sk82nj16.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
	<f43fc5581003151023g354dc74cr989f3373f5f1de9a@mail.gmail.com>
	<m3vdcx8ma9.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> <hnnf7e$8f9$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<m3ljds3auv.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
	<20100316175523.GD19160@shareable.org> <4BA09C72.9060201@redhat.com>
	<f43fc5581003171250h7d30e0adt4c6f52ee52ce24ce@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100319020302.GE14108@shareable.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:28:43 +0200
Message-ID: <f43fc5581003191328n6d64fa2fm9684682f40885e06@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH, RFC] Replace assert(0) with abort() or
	cpu_abort()
From: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 3/19/10, Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org> wrote:
> Blue Swirl wrote:
>  > But what if in addition to
>  > this, the user process forked and the other process ptraced the QEMU
>  > process,
>
>
> How good is the cross-arch ptrace() emulation, anyway? :-)

Probably as good as SIGABRT abuse support. But the case could be
native as well, not cross-arch.

Actually cross-arch execution of strace could be interesting. GDB not
so much. UML?