From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53937) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fM99e-0003uh-7K for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 May 2018 05:36:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fM99b-0000qB-0p for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 May 2018 05:36:58 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:34568 helo=mx1.redhat.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fM99a-0000pT-SI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 May 2018 05:36:54 -0400 Reply-To: otubo@redhat.com References: <20180515113348.10516-1-zyimin@linux.ibm.com> <20180515113348.10516-2-zyimin@linux.ibm.com> <20180517124109.GJ17734@vader> <20180518075212.GE3416@dnr> <20180518091916.GA22292@vader> <20180518130729.GF3416@dnr> <7149dfa9-7d3a-a2ff-b326-7e9ba71f8fe1@linux.ibm.com> <20180523074757.GI26766@dnr> <397e4f8c-0913-6ffd-13fa-743abbbd47e4@linux.ibm.com> <8de364b2-a1c8-7a29-284c-6356d687638b@redhat.com> <33d11137-210b-1a13-e258-d509f4876d67@redhat.com> <1165274f-53fa-ce25-380f-d6509ec083e5@linux.ibm.com> From: Eduardo Otubo Message-ID: Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 11:36:50 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1165274f-53fa-ce25-380f-d6509ec083e5@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/1] sandbox: disable -sandbox if CONFIG_SECCOMP undefined List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Yi Min Zhao , Paolo Bonzini , =?UTF-8?Q?J=c3=a1n_Tomko?= Cc: borntraeger@de.ibm.com, fiuczy@linux.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 05/25/2018 06:23 AM, Yi Min Zhao wrote: >=20 >=20 > =E5=9C=A8 2018/5/24 =E4=B8=8B=E5=8D=889:40, Paolo Bonzini =E5=86=99=E9=81= =93: >> On 24/05/2018 09:53, Eduardo Otubo wrote: >>>>>> Thanks! But I have not got response from Paolo.=C2=A0 I have added= him to >>>>>> CC list. >>>>>> >>>>> =C2=A0=C2=A0I'll just wait one more ACK and will send a pull reques= t on the >>>>> seccomp queue. Thanks for the contribution. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> So... what I should do is wait? >>>> >>> Yes, even though I think we're safe to proceed without his explicit a= ck. >> The patch is okay; however, as a follow-up, you could consider moving >> all the CONFIG_SECCOMP code to qemu-seccomp.c. >> >> This way, the only #ifdef remains the one around qemu_opts_foreach. >> >> Paolo >> >> > Thanks for your comment! Indeed, moving to the single C file is much=20 > more clear. > I will do this after this patch. >=20 > @Otubo, what about next step? >=20 >=20 If you're willing to send v3 with the changes Paolo suggested, I can=20 wait to send the pull request. No worries.