From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hwkmy-0005ze-PH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Jun 2007 16:10:28 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hwkmy-0005xz-1A for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Jun 2007 16:10:28 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hwkmx-0005xs-Ul for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Jun 2007 16:10:27 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Hwkmx-00069y-BR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Jun 2007 16:10:27 -0400 Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HwkmY-0003rF-GZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Jun 2007 22:10:02 +0200 Received: from bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk ([87.81.140.128]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 08 Jun 2007 22:10:02 +0200 Received: from fbsd06 by bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 08 Jun 2007 22:10:02 +0200 From: RW Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 21:00:48 +0100 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Sender: news Subject: [Qemu-devel] Emulation Slower with Kqemu Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org I run Windows 98SE with qemu on a FreeBSD 6.2 i386 host. If I load the kqemu kernel module, the emulation runs significantly slower that without it. What am I doing wrong?