From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 970E0C3A5A2 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 10:42:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DB4A20872 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 10:42:02 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6DB4A20872 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:37743 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i7day-0002Sp-PF for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 06:42:00 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36882) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i7dZD-0000ud-TX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 06:40:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i7dZC-0002g6-I7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 06:40:11 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:54870) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i7dZA-0002fA-9x; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 06:40:08 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A034806A4D; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 10:40:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-4-67.tlv.redhat.com (dhcp-4-67.tlv.redhat.com [10.35.4.67]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E2585C22F; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 10:40:03 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: From: Maxim Levitsky To: Max Reitz , qemu-block@nongnu.org Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 13:40:02 +0300 In-Reply-To: <5c843f00-eb9f-8442-fb0c-e99aa423c5a9@redhat.com> References: <20190712173600.14554-1-mreitz@redhat.com> <84a35d4dd5a915fb879a313b0d5cd30bfa6aaa67.camel@redhat.com> <5c843f00-eb9f-8442-fb0c-e99aa423c5a9@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.67]); Tue, 10 Sep 2019 10:40:07 +0000 (UTC) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH 0/7] block: Generic file creation fallback X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kevin Wolf , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Tue, 2019-09-10 at 11:16 +0200, Max Reitz wrote: > On 05.09.19 15:30, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > On Fri, 2019-07-12 at 19:35 +0200, Max Reitz wrote: > > > Hi, > > >=20 > > > Kevin commented on my RFC, so I got what an RFC wants, and he didn=E2= =80=99t > > > object to the creation fallback part. So I suppose I can go down t= hat > > > route at least. (Which was actually the more important part of the > > > series.) > > >=20 > > > So as in the RFC, this series adds a fallback path for creating fil= es > > > (on the protocol layer) if the protocol driver does not support fil= e > > > creation, but the file already exists. > > >=20 > >=20 > > Hi! > > Do you have any update on this patch series by a chance? >=20 > Unfortunately, no. I was on PTO, and before that, there was just too > much else going on. (And frankly, there=E2=80=99s still too much else = going on.) No problem! Best regards, Maxim Levitsky