From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: eduardo@habkost.net, "Laurent Vivier" <lvivier@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
mst@redhat.com, quintela@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
"Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>,
pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86: Switch to q35 as the default machine type
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 08:57:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f5ea8b34-2d50-c0d7-4ec0-ff0921dbcbd4@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yg03HB5KHGYWyI0J@work-vm>
On 16/02/2022 18.40, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Thomas Huth (thuth@redhat.com) wrote:
>> On 16/02/2022 12.01, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
>>> * Gerd Hoffmann (kraxel@redhat.com) wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>> Given the semantic differences from 'i440fx', changing the default
>>>>> machine type has effects that are equivalent to breaking command
>>>>> line syntax compatibility, which is something we've always tried
>>>>> to avoid.
>>>>
>>>> And if we are fine breaking backward compatibility I'd rather *not* pick
>>>> a default, effectively making -M $something mandatory, similar to arm.
>>>
>>> Oh, that's probably easy to do; what are other peoples thoughts on
>>> that?
>>
>> I agree with Gerd. Getting rid of a default machine on x86 is likely better
>> than silently changing it to q35. But I'd maybe say that this should go
>> through the deprecation process first?
>
> So just adding something like the following under 'System emulator
> machines':
>
> x86 default machine type
> ------------------------
>
> x86 currently defaults to the very old ```pc``` machine type
I'd scrath the "very old" above since you repeat it below...
> which is based on the very old ```i440f``` chipset. This default
> will be removed and the user will be required to specify a machine
> type explicitly using -M; users are encouraged to switch to the
> not quite as old ```q35``` machine types.
... but otherwise this sounds good to me.
> (This option is going to take a lot more work switching all the
> test cases over; in my world here I'd only changed the tests that broke
> on q35, now everything is going to need to specify a type).
We've got a bunch of targets now already that do not have a default machine
type yet (aarch64/arm, avr, rx, tricore), and some where the default machine
type does not make too much sense for testing anyway (e.g. m68k) ... so it
would maybe be good to have a global qtest_get_default_machine() function in
the qtest framework anyway instead of re-encoding this in each and every
test case.
Anyway, if we agree that the default machine type of x86 should go through
the deprecation process, we've got plenty of time to fix this up in the
tests, no need to rush this now before 7.0.
Other heretic question: Should we maybe get rid of the default machine type
for *all* targets? ... so that we do not continue to run into this issue
again and again and again...
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-17 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-15 16:25 [PATCH 0/3] x86: Switch over to q35 as the default machine type Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)
2022-02-15 16:25 ` [PATCH 1/3] tests/x86: Use 'pc' machine type for old hardware tests Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)
2022-02-17 8:04 ` Thomas Huth
2022-02-17 8:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-02-15 16:25 ` [PATCH 2/3] tests/x86: Use 'pc' machine type for hotplug tests Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)
2022-02-17 8:09 ` Thomas Huth
2022-02-17 8:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-02-15 16:25 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86: Switch to q35 as the default machine type Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)
2022-02-15 18:13 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-02-15 18:29 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2022-02-16 10:58 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-02-16 11:01 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2022-02-16 11:23 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-02-16 11:24 ` Thomas Huth
2022-02-16 17:40 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2022-02-16 17:48 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-02-16 17:57 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2022-02-17 7:46 ` Thomas Huth
2022-02-17 7:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-02-17 9:29 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-02-17 9:43 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2022-02-17 7:57 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2022-02-17 8:08 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-02-17 8:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-02-17 9:16 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-02-17 9:35 ` Igor Mammedov
2022-02-17 9:19 ` Kashyap Chamarthy
2022-02-15 16:25 ` [PATCH 0/3] x86: Switch over " Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)
2022-02-15 16:25 ` [PATCH 1/3] tests/x86: Use 'pc' machine type for old hardware tests Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)
2022-02-15 16:25 ` [PATCH 2/3] tests/x86: Use 'pc' machine type for hotplug tests Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)
2022-02-15 16:25 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86: Switch to q35 as the default machine type Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f5ea8b34-2d50-c0d7-4ec0-ff0921dbcbd4@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).