* [PATCH] linux-user: Check for EFAULT failure in nanosleep
@ 2025-07-10 16:43 Peter Maydell
2025-07-10 17:55 ` Richard Henderson
2025-07-10 17:56 ` Richard Henderson
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2025-07-10 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel; +Cc: Laurent Vivier
target_to_host_timespec() returns an error if the memory the guest
passed us isn't actually readable. We check for this everywhere
except the callsite in the TARGET_NR_nanosleep case, so this mistake
was caught by a Coverity heuristic.
Add the missing error checks to the calls that convert between the
host and target timespec structs.
Coverity: CID 1507104
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
---
Tested via the LTP nanosleep tests, but they don't actually exercise
the EFAULT codepaths...
linux-user/syscall.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/linux-user/syscall.c b/linux-user/syscall.c
index fc37028597c..c600d5ccc0e 100644
--- a/linux-user/syscall.c
+++ b/linux-user/syscall.c
@@ -11630,10 +11630,14 @@ static abi_long do_syscall1(CPUArchState *cpu_env, int num, abi_long arg1,
case TARGET_NR_nanosleep:
{
struct timespec req, rem;
- target_to_host_timespec(&req, arg1);
+ if (target_to_host_timespec(&req, arg1)) {
+ return -TARGET_EFAULT;
+ }
ret = get_errno(safe_nanosleep(&req, &rem));
if (is_error(ret) && arg2) {
- host_to_target_timespec(arg2, &rem);
+ if (host_to_target_timespec(arg2, &rem)) {
+ return -TARGET_EFAULT;
+ }
}
}
return ret;
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] linux-user: Check for EFAULT failure in nanosleep
2025-07-10 16:43 [PATCH] linux-user: Check for EFAULT failure in nanosleep Peter Maydell
@ 2025-07-10 17:55 ` Richard Henderson
2025-07-10 17:56 ` Richard Henderson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Richard Henderson @ 2025-07-10 17:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
On 7/10/25 10:43, Peter Maydell wrote:
> target_to_host_timespec() returns an error if the memory the guest
> passed us isn't actually readable. We check for this everywhere
> except the callsite in the TARGET_NR_nanosleep case, so this mistake
> was caught by a Coverity heuristic.
>
> Add the missing error checks to the calls that convert between the
> host and target timespec structs.
>
> Coverity: CID 1507104
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> ---
> Tested via the LTP nanosleep tests, but they don't actually exercise
> the EFAULT codepaths...
>
> linux-user/syscall.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
r~
>
> diff --git a/linux-user/syscall.c b/linux-user/syscall.c
> index fc37028597c..c600d5ccc0e 100644
> --- a/linux-user/syscall.c
> +++ b/linux-user/syscall.c
> @@ -11630,10 +11630,14 @@ static abi_long do_syscall1(CPUArchState *cpu_env, int num, abi_long arg1,
> case TARGET_NR_nanosleep:
> {
> struct timespec req, rem;
> - target_to_host_timespec(&req, arg1);
> + if (target_to_host_timespec(&req, arg1)) {
> + return -TARGET_EFAULT;
> + }
> ret = get_errno(safe_nanosleep(&req, &rem));
> if (is_error(ret) && arg2) {
> - host_to_target_timespec(arg2, &rem);
> + if (host_to_target_timespec(arg2, &rem)) {
> + return -TARGET_EFAULT;
> + }
> }
> }
> return ret;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] linux-user: Check for EFAULT failure in nanosleep
2025-07-10 16:43 [PATCH] linux-user: Check for EFAULT failure in nanosleep Peter Maydell
2025-07-10 17:55 ` Richard Henderson
@ 2025-07-10 17:56 ` Richard Henderson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Richard Henderson @ 2025-07-10 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
On 7/10/25 10:43, Peter Maydell wrote:
> target_to_host_timespec() returns an error if the memory the guest
> passed us isn't actually readable. We check for this everywhere
> except the callsite in the TARGET_NR_nanosleep case, so this mistake
> was caught by a Coverity heuristic.
>
> Add the missing error checks to the calls that convert between the
> host and target timespec structs.
>
> Coverity: CID 1507104
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> ---
> Tested via the LTP nanosleep tests, but they don't actually exercise
> the EFAULT codepaths...
>
> linux-user/syscall.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Queued, thanks.
r~
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-07-10 18:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-07-10 16:43 [PATCH] linux-user: Check for EFAULT failure in nanosleep Peter Maydell
2025-07-10 17:55 ` Richard Henderson
2025-07-10 17:56 ` Richard Henderson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).