From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>,
Tom Yan <tom.ty89@gmail.com>,
Ronnie Sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] SCSI: fix transfer limits for SCSI passthrough
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 14:49:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f8bca3252524372460e5cffa75fdb8a0216bc7b4.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201104173217.417538-1-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
On Wed, 2020-11-04 at 19:32 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> This patch series attempts to provide a solution to the problem of the transfer
> limits of the raw file driver (host_device/file-posix), some of which I
> already tried to fix in the past.
>
> I included 2 patches from Tom Yan which fix two issues with reading the limits
> correctly from the */dev/sg* character devices in the first place.
>
> The only change to these patches is that I tweaked a bit the comments in the
> source to better document the /dev/sg quirks.
>
> The other two patches in this series split the max transfer limits that qemu
> block devices expose in two:
> One limit is for the regular IO, and another is for the SG_IO (aka bdrv_*_ioctl),
> and the two device drivers (scsi-block and scsi-generic) that use the later
> are switched to the new interface.
>
> This should ensure that the raw driver can still advertise the unlimited
> transfer length, unless it is used for SG_IO, because that yields the highest
> performance.
>
> Also I include a somewhat unrelated fix to a bug I found in qemu's
> SCSI passthrough while testing this:
> When qemu emulates the VPD block limit page, for a SCSI device that doesn't
> implement it, it doesn't really advertise the emulated page to the guest.
>
> I tested this by doing both regular and SG_IO passthrough of my
> USB SD card reader.
>
> That device turned out to be a perfect device for the task, since it has max
> transfer size of 1024 blocks (512K), and it enforces it.
>
> Also it didn't implement the VPD block limits page,
> (transfer size limit probably comes from something USB related) which triggered
> the unrelated bug.
>
> I was able to see IO errors without the patches, and the wrong max transfer
> size in the guest, and with patches both issues were gone.
>
> I also found an unrelated issue in /dev/sg passthrough in the kernel.
> It turns out that in-kernel driver has a limitation of 16 requests in flight,
> regardless of what underlying device supports.
>
> With a large multi-threaded fio job and a debug print in qemu, it is easy to
> see it, although the errors don't do much harm to the guest as it retries the
> IO, and eventually succeed.
> It is an open question if this should be solved.
>
> Maxim Levitsky (3):
> block: add max_ioctl_transfer to BlockLimits
> block: use blk_get_max_ioctl_transfer for SCSI passthrough
> block/scsi: correctly emulate the VPD block limits page
>
> Tom Yan (2):
> file-posix: split hdev_refresh_limits from raw_refresh_limits
> file-posix: add sg_get_max_segments that actually works with sg
>
> block/block-backend.c | 12 ++++++
> block/file-posix.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> block/io.c | 2 +
> block/iscsi.c | 1 +
> hw/scsi/scsi-generic.c | 32 ++++++++------
> include/block/block_int.h | 4 ++
> include/sysemu/block-backend.h | 1 +
> 7 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.26.2
>
Very gentle ping on this path series.
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-03 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-04 17:32 [PATCH 0/5] SCSI: fix transfer limits for SCSI passthrough Maxim Levitsky
2020-11-04 17:32 ` [PATCH 1/5] file-posix: split hdev_refresh_limits from raw_refresh_limits Maxim Levitsky
2020-11-05 5:44 ` Tom Yan
2020-11-05 9:23 ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-11-04 17:32 ` [PATCH 2/5] file-posix: add sg_get_max_segments that actually works with sg Maxim Levitsky
2020-11-04 17:32 ` [PATCH 3/5] block: add max_ioctl_transfer to BlockLimits Maxim Levitsky
2020-11-04 17:32 ` [PATCH 4/5] block: use blk_get_max_ioctl_transfer for SCSI passthrough Maxim Levitsky
2020-11-04 17:32 ` [PATCH 5/5] block/scsi: correctly emulate the VPD block limits page Maxim Levitsky
2020-11-04 17:48 ` [PATCH 0/5] SCSI: fix transfer limits for SCSI passthrough no-reply
2020-11-04 18:05 ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-12-03 12:49 ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2020-12-03 13:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f8bca3252524372460e5cffa75fdb8a0216bc7b4.camel@redhat.com \
--to=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pl@kamp.de \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=ronniesahlberg@gmail.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=tom.ty89@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).