From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IGUVd-00039W-QD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2007 02:50:09 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IGUVc-000398-Bh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2007 02:50:09 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IGUVc-000394-4Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2007 02:50:08 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IGUVb-0007ru-Hy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2007 02:50:07 -0400 Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IGUVW-0006W5-8B for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2007 08:50:02 +0200 Received: from user-387ocuv.cable.mindspring.com ([208.124.51.223]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 02 Aug 2007 08:50:02 +0200 Received: from charles by user-387ocuv.cable.mindspring.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 02 Aug 2007 08:50:02 +0200 From: Charles Duffy Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 01:45:29 -0500 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: news Subject: [Qemu-devel] etherboot support in x86_64 mode? Reply-To: charles@dyfis.net, qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org I notice that the "-boot n" etherboot support doesn't appear to work when emulating x86_64 hardware (invocation as qemu-system-x86_64). Is this intentional? A known issue?