Re: [PATCH v3 06/18] hw/block/nvme: mark fw slot 1 as read-only

[Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>]

On Mon, 2020-07-06 at 08:12 +0200, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> From: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com>
> 
> Mark firmware slot 1 as read-only and only support that slot.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Fomichev <dmitry.fomichev@wdc.com>
> ---
>  hw/block/nvme.c      | 3 ++-
>  include/block/nvme.h | 4 ++++
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/block/nvme.c b/hw/block/nvme.c
> index a330ccf91620..b6bc75eb61a2 100644
> --- a/hw/block/nvme.c
> +++ b/hw/block/nvme.c
> @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@
>  #define NVME_TEMPERATURE 0x143
>  #define NVME_TEMPERATURE_WARNING 0x157
>  #define NVME_TEMPERATURE_CRITICAL 0x175
> +#define NVME_NUM_FW_SLOTS 1
>  
>  #define NVME_GUEST_ERR(trace, fmt, ...) \
>      do { \
> @@ -1666,7 +1667,7 @@ static void nvme_init_ctrl(NvmeCtrl *n, PCIDevice *pci_dev)
>       * inconsequential.
>       */
>      id->acl = 3;
> -    id->frmw = 7 << 1;
> +    id->frmw = (NVME_NUM_FW_SLOTS << 1) | NVME_FRMW_SLOT1_RO;

Offtopic:
They didn't make this one 0 based value, and yet ask for at least 1 slot. 
Just to keep us entertained I guess :-)

>      id->lpa = 1 << 0;
>  
>      /* recommended default value (~70 C) */
> diff --git a/include/block/nvme.h b/include/block/nvme.h
> index d2c457695b38..d639e8bbee92 100644
> --- a/include/block/nvme.h
> +++ b/include/block/nvme.h
> @@ -842,6 +842,10 @@ enum NvmeIdCtrlOncs {
>      NVME_ONCS_TIMESTAMP     = 1 << 6,
>  };
>  
> +enum NvmeIdCtrlFrmw {
> +    NVME_FRMW_SLOT1_RO = 1 << 0,
> +};
> +
>  #define NVME_CTRL_SQES_MIN(sqes) ((sqes) & 0xf)
>  #define NVME_CTRL_SQES_MAX(sqes) (((sqes) >> 4) & 0xf)
>  #define NVME_CTRL_CQES_MIN(cqes) ((cqes) & 0xf)

Looks good,

Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>

Best regards,
	Maxim Levitsky