From: "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@redhat.com>
To: "Duan, Zhenzhong" <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Cc: "alex.williamson@redhat.com" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"eric.auger@redhat.com" <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
"Peng, Chao P" <chao.p.peng@intel.com>,
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
Jason Herne <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
"open list:vfio-ap" <qemu-s390x@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] vfio: Make VFIOIOMMUClass::attach_device() and its wrapper return bool
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 07:57:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <faba937d-885b-4b2c-a98f-47146b053031@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SJ0PR11MB67443A9F217791EF4E6EA43792E42@SJ0PR11MB6744.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On 5/7/24 04:09, Duan, Zhenzhong wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] vfio: Make VFIOIOMMUClass::attach_device() and
>> its wrapper return bool
>>
>> On 5/6/24 10:33, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
>>> Make VFIOIOMMUClass::attach_device() and its wrapper function
>>> vfio_attach_device() return bool.
>>>
>>> This is to follow the coding standand to return bool if 'Error **'
>>> is used to pass error.
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h | 4 ++--
>>> include/hw/vfio/vfio-container-base.h | 4 ++--
>>> hw/vfio/ap.c | 6 ++----
>>> hw/vfio/ccw.c | 6 ++----
>>> hw/vfio/common.c | 4 ++--
>>> hw/vfio/container.c | 14 +++++++-------
>>> hw/vfio/iommufd.c | 11 +++++------
>>> hw/vfio/pci.c | 8 +++-----
>>> hw/vfio/platform.c | 7 +++----
>>> 9 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h b/include/hw/vfio/vfio-
>> common.h
>>> index b9da6c08ef..a7b6fc8f46 100644
>>> --- a/include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h
>>> +++ b/include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h
>>> @@ -198,8 +198,8 @@ void vfio_region_exit(VFIORegion *region);
>>> void vfio_region_finalize(VFIORegion *region);
>>> void vfio_reset_handler(void *opaque);
>>> struct vfio_device_info *vfio_get_device_info(int fd);
>>> -int vfio_attach_device(char *name, VFIODevice *vbasedev,
>>> - AddressSpace *as, Error **errp);
>>> +bool vfio_attach_device(char *name, VFIODevice *vbasedev,
>>> + AddressSpace *as, Error **errp);
>>> void vfio_detach_device(VFIODevice *vbasedev);
>>>
>>> int vfio_kvm_device_add_fd(int fd, Error **errp);
>>> diff --git a/include/hw/vfio/vfio-container-base.h b/include/hw/vfio/vfio-
>> container-base.h
>>> index 3582d5f97a..c839cfd9cb 100644
>>> --- a/include/hw/vfio/vfio-container-base.h
>>> +++ b/include/hw/vfio/vfio-container-base.h
>>> @@ -118,8 +118,8 @@ struct VFIOIOMMUClass {
>>> int (*dma_unmap)(const VFIOContainerBase *bcontainer,
>>> hwaddr iova, ram_addr_t size,
>>> IOMMUTLBEntry *iotlb);
>>> - int (*attach_device)(const char *name, VFIODevice *vbasedev,
>>> - AddressSpace *as, Error **errp);
>>> + bool (*attach_device)(const char *name, VFIODevice *vbasedev,
>>> + AddressSpace *as, Error **errp);
>>> void (*detach_device)(VFIODevice *vbasedev);
>>> /* migration feature */
>>> int (*set_dirty_page_tracking)(const VFIOContainerBase *bcontainer,
>>> diff --git a/hw/vfio/ap.c b/hw/vfio/ap.c
>>> index 7c4caa5938..d50600b702 100644
>>> --- a/hw/vfio/ap.c
>>> +++ b/hw/vfio/ap.c
>>> @@ -156,7 +156,6 @@ static void
>> vfio_ap_unregister_irq_notifier(VFIOAPDevice *vapdev,
>>> static void vfio_ap_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>>> {
>>> ERRP_GUARD();
>>> - int ret;
>>> Error *err = NULL;
>>> VFIOAPDevice *vapdev = VFIO_AP_DEVICE(dev);
>>> VFIODevice *vbasedev = &vapdev->vdev;
>>> @@ -165,9 +164,8 @@ static void vfio_ap_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error
>> **errp)
>>> return;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - ret = vfio_attach_device(vbasedev->name, vbasedev,
>>> - &address_space_memory, errp);
>>> - if (ret) {
>>> + if (!vfio_attach_device(vbasedev->name, vbasedev,
>>> + &address_space_memory, errp)) {
>>> goto error;
>>> }
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/vfio/ccw.c b/hw/vfio/ccw.c
>>> index 90e4a53437..782bd4bed7 100644
>>> --- a/hw/vfio/ccw.c
>>> +++ b/hw/vfio/ccw.c
>>> @@ -580,7 +580,6 @@ static void vfio_ccw_realize(DeviceState *dev,
>> Error **errp)
>>> S390CCWDeviceClass *cdc = S390_CCW_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(cdev);
>>> VFIODevice *vbasedev = &vcdev->vdev;
>>> Error *err = NULL;
>>> - int ret;
>>>
>>> /* Call the class init function for subchannel. */
>>> if (cdc->realize) {
>>> @@ -594,9 +593,8 @@ static void vfio_ccw_realize(DeviceState *dev,
>> Error **errp)
>>> return;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - ret = vfio_attach_device(cdev->mdevid, vbasedev,
>>> - &address_space_memory, errp);
>>> - if (ret) {
>>> + if (!vfio_attach_device(cdev->mdevid, vbasedev,
>>> + &address_space_memory, errp)) {
>>> goto out_attach_dev_err;
>>> }
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/vfio/common.c b/hw/vfio/common.c
>>> index 8f9cbdc026..890d30910e 100644
>>> --- a/hw/vfio/common.c
>>> +++ b/hw/vfio/common.c
>>> @@ -1492,8 +1492,8 @@ retry:
>>> return info;
>>> }
>>>
>>> -int vfio_attach_device(char *name, VFIODevice *vbasedev,
>>> - AddressSpace *as, Error **errp)
>>> +bool vfio_attach_device(char *name, VFIODevice *vbasedev,
>>> + AddressSpace *as, Error **errp)
>>> {
>>> const VFIOIOMMUClass *ops =
>>>
>> VFIO_IOMMU_CLASS(object_class_by_name(TYPE_VFIO_IOMMU_LEGACY));
>>
>>
>> I think vfio_attach_device() can be cleaned up a little further :
>>
>> ret = ops->attach_device(name, vbasedev, as, errp);
>> if (ret < 0) {
>> return ret;
>> }
>
> Not understand this.
> I have both ops->attach_device() and vfio_attach_device() return bool
> in this patch. Do you mean drop the change for ops->attach_device()?
> Or split the two changes?
The return value of ops->attach_device() should be tested as a bool now
and not as an int, as it is still currently done.
See the fix here :
https://gitlab.com/legoater/qemu/-/commit/abae88dc28e723745fe2ff506ea9f0adeb47afdb
Please simply fold the changes in this patch.
Thanks,
C.
>>
>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/vfio/container.c b/hw/vfio/container.c
>>> index 77bdec276e..ea3b145913 100644
>>> --- a/hw/vfio/container.c
>>> +++ b/hw/vfio/container.c
>>> @@ -908,8 +908,8 @@ static int vfio_device_groupid(VFIODevice
>> *vbasedev, Error **errp)
>>> * @name and @vbasedev->name are likely to be different depending
>>> * on the type of the device, hence the need for passing @name
>>> */
>>> -static int vfio_legacy_attach_device(const char *name, VFIODevice
>> *vbasedev,
>>> - AddressSpace *as, Error **errp)
>>> +static bool vfio_legacy_attach_device(const char *name, VFIODevice
>> *vbasedev,
>>> + AddressSpace *as, Error **errp)
>>> {
>>> int groupid = vfio_device_groupid(vbasedev, errp);
>>> VFIODevice *vbasedev_iter;
>>> @@ -918,27 +918,27 @@ static int vfio_legacy_attach_device(const char
>> *name, VFIODevice *vbasedev,
>>> int ret;
>>>
>>> if (groupid < 0) {
>>> - return groupid;
>>> + return false;
>>> }
>>>
>>> trace_vfio_attach_device(vbasedev->name, groupid);
>>>
>>> group = vfio_get_group(groupid, as, errp);
>>> if (!group) {
>>> - return -ENOENT;
>>> + return false;
>>> }
>>>
>>> QLIST_FOREACH(vbasedev_iter, &group->device_list, next) {
>>> if (strcmp(vbasedev_iter->name, vbasedev->name) == 0) {
>>> error_setg(errp, "device is already attached");
>>> vfio_put_group(group);
>>> - return -EBUSY;
>>> + return false;
>>> }
>>> }
>>> ret = vfio_get_device(group, name, vbasedev, errp);
>>> if (ret) {
>>
>> vfio_get_device() would be the next candidate for cleanup.
>
> Yes.
>
>>
>>> vfio_put_group(group);
>>> - return ret;
>>> + return false;
>>> }
>>>
>>> bcontainer = &group->container->bcontainer;
>>> @@ -946,7 +946,7 @@ static int vfio_legacy_attach_device(const char
>> *name, VFIODevice *vbasedev,
>>> QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&bcontainer->device_list, vbasedev,
>> container_next);
>>> QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&vfio_device_list, vbasedev, global_next);
>>>
>>> - return ret;
>>> + return true;
>>> }
>>>
>>> static void vfio_legacy_detach_device(VFIODevice *vbasedev)
>>> diff --git a/hw/vfio/iommufd.c b/hw/vfio/iommufd.c
>>> index 8827ffe636..9aa0dd6d8e 100644
>>> --- a/hw/vfio/iommufd.c
>>> +++ b/hw/vfio/iommufd.c
>>> @@ -301,8 +301,8 @@ error:
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static int iommufd_cdev_attach(const char *name, VFIODevice *vbasedev,
>>> - AddressSpace *as, Error **errp)
>>> +static bool iommufd_cdev_attach(const char *name, VFIODevice
>> *vbasedev,
>>> + AddressSpace *as, Error **errp)
>>> {
>>> VFIOContainerBase *bcontainer;
>>> VFIOIOMMUFDContainer *container;
>>> @@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ static int iommufd_cdev_attach(const char *name,
>> VFIODevice *vbasedev,
>>> if (vbasedev->fd < 0) {
>>> devfd = iommufd_cdev_getfd(vbasedev->sysfsdev, errp);
>>> if (devfd < 0) {
>>> - return devfd;
>>> + return false;
>>> }
>>> vbasedev->fd = devfd;
>>> } else {
>>> @@ -394,7 +394,6 @@ static int iommufd_cdev_attach(const char *name,
>> VFIODevice *vbasedev,
>>> memory_listener_register(&bcontainer->listener, bcontainer->space-
>>> as);
>>>
>>> if (bcontainer->error) {
>>> - ret = -1;
>>> error_propagate_prepend(errp, bcontainer->error,
>>> "memory listener initialization failed: ");
>>> goto err_listener_register;
>>> @@ -433,7 +432,7 @@ found_container:
>>>
>>> trace_iommufd_cdev_device_info(vbasedev->name, devfd, vbasedev-
>>> num_irqs,
>>> vbasedev->num_regions, vbasedev->flags);
>>> - return 0;
>>> + return true;
>>>
>>> err_listener_register:
>>> iommufd_cdev_ram_block_discard_disable(false);
>>> @@ -446,7 +445,7 @@ err_alloc_ioas:
>>> iommufd_cdev_unbind_and_disconnect(vbasedev);
>>> err_connect_bind:
>>> close(vbasedev->fd);
>>> - return ret;
>>> + return false;
>>> }
>>>
>>> static void iommufd_cdev_detach(VFIODevice *vbasedev)
>>> diff --git a/hw/vfio/pci.c b/hw/vfio/pci.c
>>> index 64780d1b79..952e4b1a25 100644
>>> --- a/hw/vfio/pci.c
>>> +++ b/hw/vfio/pci.c
>>> @@ -2951,7 +2951,7 @@ static void vfio_realize(PCIDevice *pdev, Error
>> **errp)
>>> int i, ret;
>>> bool is_mdev;
>>> char uuid[UUID_STR_LEN];
>>> - char *name;
>>> + g_autofree char *name = NULL;
>>>
>>> if (vbasedev->fd < 0 && !vbasedev->sysfsdev) {
>>> if (!(~vdev->host.domain || ~vdev->host.bus ||
>>> @@ -3001,10 +3001,8 @@ static void vfio_realize(PCIDevice *pdev, Error
>> **errp)
>>> name = g_strdup(vbasedev->name);
>>> }
>>>
>>> - ret = vfio_attach_device(name, vbasedev,
>>> - pci_device_iommu_address_space(pdev), errp);
>>> - g_free(name);
>>
>> This change would deserve another patch.
>
> Will do.
>
> Thanks
> Zhenzhong
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-07 5:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-06 8:33 [PATCH 0/3] Cleanup VFIOIOMMUClass callback return with bool Zhenzhong Duan
2024-05-06 8:33 ` [PATCH 1/3] vfio: Make VFIOIOMMUClass::attach_device() and its wrapper return bool Zhenzhong Duan
2024-05-06 11:59 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-05-07 2:09 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2024-05-07 5:57 ` Cédric Le Goater [this message]
2024-05-07 6:09 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2024-05-06 8:33 ` [PATCH 2/3] vfio: Make VFIOIOMMUClass::setup() " Zhenzhong Duan
2024-05-06 12:02 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-05-06 8:33 ` [PATCH 3/3] vfio: Make VFIOIOMMUClass::add_window() and its wrapper " Zhenzhong Duan
2024-05-06 12:06 ` Cédric Le Goater
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=faba937d-885b-4b2c-a98f-47146b053031@redhat.com \
--to=clg@redhat.com \
--cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=chao.p.peng@intel.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=zhenzhong.duan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).