From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: William Roche <william.roche@oracle.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org
Cc: peterx@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
richard.henderson@linaro.org, philmd@linaro.org,
peter.maydell@linaro.org, mtosatti@redhat.com,
imammedo@redhat.com, eduardo@habkost.net,
marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com, wangyanan55@huawei.com,
zhao1.liu@intel.com, joao.m.martins@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] system/physmem: poisoned memory discard on reboot
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 23:06:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fb1529d9-4c92-4bdd-8dae-404a49cfd7b3@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a79a2639-a6f1-4ca1-9b12-d4e125d894d4@oracle.com>
>> For shared memory we really need it.
>>
>> Private file-backed is weird ... because we don't know if the shared or
>> the private page is problematic ... :(
>
>
> I agree with you, and we have to decide when should we bail out if
> ram_block_discard_range() doesn't work.
> According to me, if discard doesn't work and we are dealing with
> file-backed largepages (shared or not) we have to exit, because the
> fallocate is mandatory. It is the case with hugetlbfs.
> > In the non-file-backed case, or the file-backed non-largepage private
> case, according to me we can trust the mmap() method to put everything
> back in place for the VM reset to work as expected.
> Are there aspects I don't see, and for which mmap + the remap handler is
> not sufficient and we should also bail out here ?
mmap() will only zap anonymous pages, no pagecache pages. See below.
>>
>> Maybe we should just do:
>>
>> if (block->fd >= 0) {
>> /* mmap(MAP_FIXED) cannot reliably zap our problematic page. */
>> error_report(...);
>> exit(-1);
>> }
>>
>> Or alternatively
>>
>> if (block->fd >= 0 && qemu_ram_is_shared(block)) {
>> /* mmap() cannot possibly zap our problematic page. */
>> error_report(...);
>> exit(-1);
>> } else if (block->fd >= 0) {
>> /*
>> * MAP_PRIVATE file-backed ... mmap() can only zap the private
>> * page, not the shared one ... we don't know which one is
>> * problematic.
>> */
>> warn_report(...);
>> }
>
> I also agree that any file-backed/shared case should bail out if discard
> (fallocate) fails, no mater large or standard pages are used.
>
> In the case of file-backed private standard pages, I think that a poison
> on the private page can be fixed with a new mmap.
> According to me, there are 2 cases to consider: at the moment the poison
> is seen, the page was dirty (so it means that it was a pure private
> page), or the page was not dirty, and in this case the poison could
> replace this non-dirty page with a new copy of the file content.
> In both cases, I'd say that the remap should clean up the poison.
Let's assume we have mmap(MAP_RIVATE, fd). The following scenarios are
possible:
(a) We only have a pagecache page (never written) that is poisoned
-> mmap(MAP_FIXED) cannot resolve that
(b) We only have an anonymous page (e.g., pagecache truncated, or if the
hugetlb file was empty) that is poisoned
-> mmap(MAP_FIXED) can resolve that
(c) We have an anonymous and a pagecache page (written -> COW).
(c1) Anonymous page is poisoned -> mmap(MAP_FIXED) can resolve that
(c2) Pagecache page is poisoned -> mmap(MAP_FIXED) cannot resolve that
So mmap(MAP_FIXED) cannot sort out all cases. In practice, (a) and (c2)
are uncommon, but possible.
(b) is common with hugetlb. (a) and (c) are uncommon with hugetlb, just
because of the nature of hugetlb pages being a scarce resource.
And IIRC, (b) with hugetlb should should be sorted out with
mmap(MAP_FIXED). Please double-check.
>
> So the conditions when discard fails, could be something like:
>
> if (block->fd >= 0 && (qemu_ram_is_shared(block) ||
> (length > TARGET_PAGE_SIZE))) {
> /* punch hole is mandatory, mmap() cannot possibly zap our page*/
> error_report("%spage recovery failure addr: "
> RAM_ADDR_FMT "@" RAM_ADDR_FMT "",
> (length > TARGET_PAGE_SIZE) ? "large " : "",
> length, addr);
I'm not sure if we should be special-casing hugetlb.
If we want to be 100% sure, we will do
if (block->fd >= 0) {
error_report();
exit(1);
}
But we could decide to be "nice" to hugetlb and assume (b) for them
above: that is, we would do
/*
* mmap() cannot zap pagecache pages, only anonymous pages. As soon as
* we might have pagecache pages involved (either private or shared
* mapping), we must be careful. However, MAP_PRIVATE on empty hugetlb
* files is common, and extremely uncommon on non-empty hugetlb files,
* so we'll special-case them here.
*/
if (block->fd >= 0 && (qemu_ram_is_shared(block) ||
length == TARGET_PAGE_SIZE))) {
...
}
[in practice, we could use /proc/self/pagemap to see if we map an
anonymous page ... but I'd rather not go down that path just yet]
But, in the end the expectation is that madvise()+fallocate() will
usually not fail.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-12 22:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 119+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-10 9:07 [RFC 0/6] hugetlbfs largepage RAS project “William Roche
2024-09-10 9:07 ` [RFC 1/6] accel/kvm: SIGBUS handler should also deal with si_addr_lsb “William Roche
2024-09-10 9:07 ` [RFC 2/6] accel/kvm: Keep track of the HWPoisonPage sizes “William Roche
2024-09-10 9:07 ` [RFC 3/6] system/physmem: Remap memory pages on reset based on the page size “William Roche
2024-09-10 9:07 ` [RFC 4/6] system: Introducing hugetlbfs largepage RAS feature “William Roche
2024-09-10 9:07 ` [RFC 5/6] system/hugetlb_ras: Handle madvise SIGBUS signal on listener “William Roche
2024-09-10 9:07 ` [RFC 6/6] system/hugetlb_ras: Replay lost BUS_MCEERR_AO signals on VM resume “William Roche
2024-09-10 10:02 ` [RFC RESEND 0/6] hugetlbfs largepage RAS project “William Roche
2024-09-10 10:02 ` [RFC RESEND 1/6] accel/kvm: SIGBUS handler should also deal with si_addr_lsb “William Roche
2024-09-10 10:02 ` [RFC RESEND 2/6] accel/kvm: Keep track of the HWPoisonPage sizes “William Roche
2024-09-10 10:02 ` [RFC RESEND 3/6] system/physmem: Remap memory pages on reset based on the page size “William Roche
2024-09-10 10:02 ` [RFC RESEND 4/6] system: Introducing hugetlbfs largepage RAS feature “William Roche
2024-09-10 10:02 ` [RFC RESEND 5/6] system/hugetlb_ras: Handle madvise SIGBUS signal on listener “William Roche
2024-09-10 10:02 ` [RFC RESEND 6/6] system/hugetlb_ras: Replay lost BUS_MCEERR_AO signals on VM resume “William Roche
2024-09-10 11:36 ` [RFC RESEND 0/6] hugetlbfs largepage RAS project David Hildenbrand
2024-09-10 16:24 ` William Roche
2024-09-11 22:07 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-12 17:07 ` William Roche
2024-09-19 16:52 ` William Roche
2024-10-09 15:45 ` Peter Xu
2024-10-10 20:35 ` William Roche
2024-10-22 21:34 ` [PATCH v1 0/4] hugetlbfs memory HW error fixes “William Roche
2024-10-22 21:35 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] accel/kvm: SIGBUS handler should also deal with si_addr_lsb “William Roche
2024-10-22 21:35 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] accel/kvm: Keep track of the HWPoisonPage page_size “William Roche
2024-10-23 7:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-25 23:27 ` William Roche
2024-10-28 16:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-30 1:56 ` William Roche
2024-11-04 14:10 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-25 23:30 ` William Roche
2024-10-22 21:35 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] system/physmem: Largepage punch hole before reset of memory pages “William Roche
2024-10-23 7:30 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-25 23:27 ` William Roche
2024-10-28 17:01 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-30 1:56 ` William Roche
2024-11-04 13:30 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-07 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] hugetlbfs memory HW error fixes “William Roche
2024-11-07 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] accel/kvm: Keep track of the HWPoisonPage page_size “William Roche
2024-11-12 10:30 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-12 18:17 ` William Roche
2024-11-12 21:35 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-07 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] system/physmem: poisoned memory discard on reboot “William Roche
2024-11-12 11:07 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-12 18:17 ` William Roche
2024-11-12 22:06 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2024-11-07 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] accel/kvm: Report the loss of a large memory page “William Roche
2024-11-12 11:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-12 18:17 ` William Roche
2024-11-12 22:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-15 21:03 ` William Roche
2024-11-18 9:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-07 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] numa: Introduce and use ram_block_notify_remap() “William Roche
2024-11-07 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] hostmem: Factor out applying settings “William Roche
2024-11-07 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] hostmem: Handle remapping of RAM “William Roche
2024-11-12 13:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-12 18:17 ` William Roche
2024-11-12 22:24 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-07 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] system/physmem: Memory settings applied on remap notification “William Roche
2024-10-22 21:35 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] accel/kvm: Report the loss of a large memory page “William Roche
2024-10-28 16:32 ` [RFC RESEND 0/6] hugetlbfs largepage RAS project David Hildenbrand
2024-11-25 14:27 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] hugetlbfs memory HW error fixes “William Roche
2024-11-25 14:27 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] hwpoison_page_list and qemu_ram_remap are based of pages “William Roche
2024-11-25 14:27 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] system/physmem: poisoned memory discard on reboot “William Roche
2024-11-25 14:27 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] accel/kvm: Report the loss of a large memory page “William Roche
2024-11-25 14:27 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] numa: Introduce and use ram_block_notify_remap() “William Roche
2024-11-25 14:27 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] hostmem: Factor out applying settings “William Roche
2024-11-25 14:27 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] hostmem: Handle remapping of RAM “William Roche
2024-11-25 14:27 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] system/physmem: Memory settings applied on remap notification “William Roche
2024-12-02 15:41 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] hugetlbfs memory HW error fixes William Roche
2024-12-02 16:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-12-03 0:15 ` William Roche
2024-12-03 14:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-12-03 14:39 ` William Roche
2024-12-03 15:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-12-06 18:26 ` William Roche
2024-12-09 21:25 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-12-14 13:45 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] Poisoned memory recovery on reboot “William Roche
2024-12-14 13:45 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] hwpoison_page_list and qemu_ram_remap are based on pages “William Roche
2025-01-08 21:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-10 20:56 ` William Roche
2025-01-14 13:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-12-14 13:45 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] system/physmem: poisoned memory discard on reboot “William Roche
2025-01-08 21:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-10 20:56 ` William Roche
2025-01-14 14:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-27 21:15 ` William Roche
2024-12-14 13:45 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] accel/kvm: Report the loss of a large memory page “William Roche
2024-12-14 13:45 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] numa: Introduce and use ram_block_notify_remap() “William Roche
2024-12-14 13:45 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] hostmem: Factor out applying settings “William Roche
2025-01-08 21:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-10 20:56 ` William Roche
2024-12-14 13:45 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] hostmem: Handle remapping of RAM “William Roche
2025-01-08 21:51 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] c David Hildenbrand
2025-01-10 20:57 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] hostmem: Handle remapping of RAM William Roche
2024-12-14 13:45 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] system/physmem: Memory settings applied on remap notification “William Roche
2025-01-08 21:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-10 20:57 ` William Roche
2025-01-14 14:01 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-08 21:22 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] Poisoned memory recovery on reboot David Hildenbrand
2025-01-10 20:55 ` William Roche
2025-01-10 21:13 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] " “William Roche
2025-01-10 21:14 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] system/physmem: handle hugetlb correctly in qemu_ram_remap() “William Roche
2025-01-14 14:02 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-27 21:16 ` William Roche
2025-01-28 18:41 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-10 21:14 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] system/physmem: poisoned memory discard on reboot “William Roche
2025-01-14 14:07 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-27 21:16 ` William Roche
2025-01-10 21:14 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] accel/kvm: Report the loss of a large memory page “William Roche
2025-01-14 14:09 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-27 21:16 ` William Roche
2025-01-28 18:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-10 21:14 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] numa: Introduce and use ram_block_notify_remap() “William Roche
2025-01-10 21:14 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] hostmem: Factor out applying settings “William Roche
2025-01-10 21:14 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] hostmem: Handle remapping of RAM “William Roche
2025-01-14 14:11 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-27 21:16 ` William Roche
2025-01-14 14:12 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] Poisoned memory recovery on reboot David Hildenbrand
2025-01-27 21:16 ` William Roche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fb1529d9-4c92-4bdd-8dae-404a49cfd7b3@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
--cc=william.roche@oracle.com \
--cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).