From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G7BMX-0002RJ-CH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 30 Jul 2006 09:29:45 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G7BMV-0002Qf-Eq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 30 Jul 2006 09:29:44 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G7BMV-0002Qc-99 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 30 Jul 2006 09:29:43 -0400 Received: from [64.233.182.190] (helo=nf-out-0910.google.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G7BOw-00089l-QP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 30 Jul 2006 09:32:15 -0400 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id a25so216125nfc for ; Sun, 30 Jul 2006 06:29:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 15:29:41 +0200 From: "andrzej zaborowski" Sender: balrogg@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] State of TI OMAP board support? In-Reply-To: <1935067809.20060730112614@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1935067809.20060730112614@gmail.com> Reply-To: balrogg@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paul Sokolovsky , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi, On 30/07/06, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: > Hello qemu-devel, > > I wonder, what's the state of TI OMAP patch, previously announced on > the list by Andrzej Zaborowski > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2006-03/msg00125.html ? > Is it considered for inclusion in the mainline? If not, what precludes > that? I made some progress on the OMAP 310 emulation but I probably won't finish it till I absolutely need it (which might be soon). I think I will consider it finished when I can run PalmOS 5.0 on it. Linux works absolutely fine, but PalmOS boots only halfway through and gets stuck in some loop (probably not the OMAP emulation fault, probably one of the peripheral chips, which are also emulated). Running a closed-source OS is a real stress-test for an emulator. I don't think it is considered for inclusion. Before it is merged I would like to separate the generic OMAP code from board-related code (the board I emulate is the Palm Tunsgten|E handheld), but I imagine the QEMU maintainers won't like the way code is formatted and probably many other things, hard to say. If you want to emulate a different OMAP processor you'll probably want to add the emulation of the DSP part, which 310 doesn't have and it may a whole lot of additional work. Also, my current tree is based on QEMU 0.8.0. > > -- > Best regards, > Paul mailto:pmiscml@gmail.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > Qemu-devel mailing list > Qemu-devel@nongnu.org > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel > Regards, -- balrog 2oo6 Dear Outlook users: Please remove me from your address books http://www.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=03/08/21/143258