From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I1sXE-00029O-Qu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 19:27:24 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I1sXD-00029C-ES for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 19:27:23 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I1sXD-000299-8x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 19:27:23 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.172]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1I1sXC-0002IR-TY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 19:27:23 -0400 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id a2so843084ugf for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 16:27:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 01:27:18 +0200 From: "andrzej zaborowski" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-i386 segfaults running "hello world". In-Reply-To: <467C578F.1090206@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200706221715.16729.rob@landley.net> <200706221831.20531.rob@landley.net> <467C578F.1090206@suse.de> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 23/06/07, Alexander Graf wrote: > Rob Landley wrote: > > Ok, it's a more fundamental problem: > > > > landley@triolith:/sys$ qemu-i386 > > Segmentation fault (core dumped) > > > > Nothing to do with the program it's trying to run, it segfaults with no > > arguments. > > > > Is anybody else seeing this? > > > > Rob > > > agraf@mac:/vm/qemu-devel/patches/qemu> qemu-i386 ~/hello > Hello world! > > Well it works for me. I usually see this segfault when trying to compile > qemu with a gcc4. Try gcc3 and everything should be fine. I usually see this when I forget to rebuild all files affected by a recent change (because the Makefile doesn't make the .depend before you tell it to). Regards