From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Iz1e8-0008Dh-DK
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 02 Dec 2007 22:07:00 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Iz1e6-0008DK-HC
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 02 Dec 2007 22:06:59 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iz1e6-0008DH-DK
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 02 Dec 2007 22:06:58 -0500
Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.169])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <balrogg@gmail.com>) id 1Iz1e5-0006RJ-UD
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 02 Dec 2007 22:06:58 -0500
Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so2233128uge
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sun, 02 Dec 2007 19:06:57 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <fb249edb0712021906y704c9780w473dcc8e15793ed5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 04:06:56 +0100
From: "andrzej zaborowski" <balrogg@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Ensure SIGALRM causes a cpu_loop_exit
In-Reply-To: <20071202164204.GD617@networkno.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <fb249edb0711231450u5f2405e9h1f36ec879afa114e@mail.gmail.com>
	<200711232343.37131.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<fb249edb0711241513t16a6074ekb472850a14dd30a5@mail.gmail.com>
	<20071202164204.GD617@networkno.de>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 02/12/2007, Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de> wrote:
> andrzej zaborowski wrote:
> > On 24/11/2007, Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> > > > There is a chance that when using "unix" or "dynticks" clock, the
> > > > signal arrives when no cpu is executing.
> >
> > How about this version, this one touches vl.c only:
>
> Any reason why this isn't in CVS?

I wanted to make sure there were no objections :)
Now committed this in the form it was in the last message.
Regards