From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Izfxy-0000N3-3j for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 17:10:10 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Izfxw-0000KO-7p for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 17:10:09 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Izfxw-0000Js-1T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 17:10:08 -0500 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.170]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Izfxv-0003IW-DN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 17:10:07 -0500 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so194515uge for ; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 14:10:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 23:10:05 +0100 From: "andrzej zaborowski" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: gcc In-Reply-To: <87zlwqw3bu.fsf@brigitte.dna.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200712032020.29182.rickv@hobi.com> <87zlwqw3bu.fsf@brigitte.dna.fi> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: ananaza@iki.fi, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 04/12/2007, Antti P Miettinen wrote: > Rick Vernam writes: > > any comments on the current status of moving beyond dependency on GCC 3.3.6? > > Sorry for a vague ignorant question, but would the gcc-4 issues be > affected in any way if the ops were inside a big function (use labels > to find them) vs the current use of separate functions? They might likely be affected but it would be an equally fragile and compiler-dependent solution and I think not worth putting the time it would take to adapt dyngen to this. Regards