From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JLUrM-0006t2-Nv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 21:45:32 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JLUrL-0006sm-8g for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 21:45:32 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JLUrL-0006sj-15 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 21:45:31 -0500 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.170]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JLUrK-0007g2-Rf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 21:45:31 -0500 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so864496uge.4 for ; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 18:45:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 03:45:29 +0100 From: "andrzej zaborowski" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH]SVM CR8 undefined bug fix In-Reply-To: <478F79A3.3020108@csgraf.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <14921864.post@talk.nabble.com> <478F79A3.3020108@csgraf.de> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 17/01/2008, Alexander Graf wrote: > TeLeMan wrote: > > env->cr[8] used by SVM codes was not defined. > > As far as I remember cr8 is the very same as the TPR, so we only need to > implement one and map the other to the value we want. I committed the original patch to avoid possible corruption of env, for now, if you have a better patch to remove the confusion between CR8 and TPR, please rediff on top of cvs. Thanks