From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JmI1T-0007Nx-HI
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:30:43 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JmI1S-0007Mc-5H
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:30:43 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JmI1R-0007MZ-W1
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:30:42 -0400
Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.168])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <balrogg@gmail.com>) id 1JmI1R-0004eb-Ei
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:30:41 -0400
Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so1059284uge.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:30:35 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <fb249edb0804161730n2f0e16cfq73f8b4a372b7be68@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 02:30:35 +0200
From: "andrzej zaborowski" <balrogg@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] No localtime_r in windows
In-Reply-To: <fu367n$ttl$1@ger.gmane.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <fu367n$ttl$1@ger.gmane.org>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Hi,

On 15/04/2008, consul <void@aleksoft.net> wrote:
> I don't pretend it is the correct patch, but at least it fixes the compile
>  time error on windows and seems to work. I'm not sure if the thread-safety
>  mechanism is needed here, or if this is the proper place to define the
>  function.

Thanks for spotting that (also thanks to Herve Poussineau).  I
converted the TWL92230 RTC to use qemu's own time/date functions and
there should be no localtime_r uses left there.

Regards
-- 
Please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary. Spread
environmental awareness.