From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JpqWh-0004ns-96 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 26 Apr 2008 15:57:39 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JpqWf-0004l3-Q5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 26 Apr 2008 15:57:38 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35459 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JpqWf-0004kn-I9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 26 Apr 2008 15:57:37 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.174]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JpqWf-00015x-1b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 26 Apr 2008 15:57:37 -0400 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so383653uge.4 for ; Sat, 26 Apr 2008 12:57:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 21:57:35 +0200 From: "andrzej zaborowski" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [4261] Errors while registering ioports are not fatal (Glauber Costa). In-Reply-To: <200804262026.06396.paul@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200804262026.06396.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paul Brook Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 26/04/2008, Paul Brook wrote: > On Saturday 26 April 2008, Andrzej Zaborowski wrote: > > Revision: 4261 > > http://svn.sv.gnu.org/viewvc/?view=rev&root=qemu&revision=4261 > > Author: balrog > > Date: 2008-04-26 16:04:29 +0000 (Sat, 26 Apr 2008) > > > > Log Message: > > ----------- > > Errors while registering ioports are not fatal (Glauber Costa). > > Why shouldn't they be fatal? How can this be anything other than a serious bug > in the device emulation? This change is perhaps not useful, it would be useful with hot-plugged / proxied pci devices. I think they are desirable features. But the patchsets submitted turn out to depend on too much kvm code to ever work alone so I might just as well revert :( You might not want qemu to quit a running session if it's possible to continue running, even if there turns out to be a serious bug. Regards