From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KnkuZ-0006IT-32 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2008 22:05:55 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KnkuX-0006IH-M2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2008 22:05:54 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54278 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KnkuX-0006IE-JZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2008 22:05:53 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.244]:18355) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KnkuY-0003QQ-2H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2008 22:05:54 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id f25so3919419rvb.22 for ; Wed, 08 Oct 2008 19:05:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 04:05:51 +0200 From: "andrzej zaborowski" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch 2/2] machine struct - specify max_cpus at the per machine level In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <48EA0E7F.9090100@sgi.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org 2008/10/8 Jes Sorensen : > andrzej> No machine has 0 cpus so there's no point specifying = 1 in > andrzej> every machine instead of making it the default. The other > andrzej> fields were thought so that they don't have to be specified > andrzej> except for non-default values. > > Well making 0 mean 1 is even worse, and adding a 1 in those isn't Why? 0 can only mean that the field was left out. Regards