From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KqEV1-0002su-As for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2008 18:05:47 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KqEUz-0002rc-O1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2008 18:05:46 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42302 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KqEUz-0002rU-Iv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2008 18:05:45 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.246]:41157) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KqEUz-0007cy-DI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2008 18:05:45 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id f25so2540898rvb.22 for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:05:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:05:43 +0200 From: "andrzej zaborowski" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] uhci: rewrite UHCI emulator, fully async operation with multiple outstanding transactions In-Reply-To: <48F64A71.5070303@qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200810112354.m9BNsXXh060894@saturn.kn-bremen.de> <48F64A71.5070303@qualcomm.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Juergen Lock 2008/10/15 Max Krasnyansky : > Hi Juergen, > > Juergen Lock wrote: >> >> This is whats got committed as r5050, right? It causes a large slowdown >> with some linux guests, as posted here: >> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2008-09/msg01201.html >> As mentioned the guest I tested was: >> sidux-2008-03-ourea-pre1-kde-lite-i386-200809142136.iso >> It uses a Linux 2.6.26 kernel, a FreeBSD guest is not affected by the >> slowness, could this be related to dynticks? >> >> Oh and on one box transfers over the emulated usb nic even sometimes >> stall, I have to ping the guest's ip for them to continue, and the ping >> then loses packets too. > > Can you please clarify your setup. As I understood, from the thread you > mentioned above, you're running Linux 2.6.26 guest on QEMU under FreeBSD > host,correct ? For the record on Linux host I observed the same issues. Juergen mentioned that in an earlier mail. The transfer rate is about 60kB/s reading from an emulated mass storage device using a raw image. It was before about 1MB/s according to Juergen. I wasn't using dynticks. Cheers