From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KuY0w-0002BB-5S for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:44:34 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KuY0s-00029W-73 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:44:33 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48308 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KuY0s-00029T-1L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:44:30 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.249]:20662) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KuY0r-00017V-Cn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:44:29 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id f25so2041017rvb.22 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:44:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:44:26 +0100 From: "andrzej zaborowski" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Duplicate initializer in curses_keys.h Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Blue Swirl Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" 2008/10/27 Blue Swirl : > Sparse complains about initializer entry defined twice in curses_keys.h: > ['\t'] = 15, /* Tab */ > [0x009] = 23 | CNTRL, /* Control + i */ > > Which one is correct? Turns out both are correct :-p Ctrl + i and Tab are indistinguishable in console. While it doesn't matter when the guest is also a unix console, I guess Tab is more useful so I'll remove ^I. Cheers