From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KulwQ-0001rr-Fu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 06:36:51 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KulwM-0001qT-QK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 06:36:48 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56654 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KulwM-0001qC-Cn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 06:36:46 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.240]:42361) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KulwM-000240-9M for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 06:36:46 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id f25so2351084rvb.22 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 03:36:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:36:42 +0100 From: "andrzej zaborowski" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] fix SIOCATMARK In-Reply-To: <1224109730.7266.28.camel@laurov-desktop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1224109730.7266.28.camel@laurov-desktop> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 15/10/2008, Lauro Ramos Venancio wrote: > The SIOCATMARK ioctl receives one parameter. The argument is a pointer and a value is returned through it so shouldn't the IOC_* access flags be set? Cheers