From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L6cYk-0001Sh-0Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 29 Nov 2008 22:01:22 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L6cYj-0001SV-3G for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 29 Nov 2008 22:01:21 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37823 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L6cYi-0001SS-SJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 29 Nov 2008 22:01:20 -0500 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.236]:35879) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L6cYi-0004Tq-Ae for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 29 Nov 2008 22:01:20 -0500 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id f9so2538454rvb.3 for ; Sat, 29 Nov 2008 19:01:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 04:01:17 +0100 From: "andrzej zaborowski" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Cross compiling qemu for ARM In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200811281327.29725.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org 2008/11/28 Steffen Liebergeld : > Hi Paul, > > Paul Brook schrieb: >> On Friday 28 November 2008, Steffen Liebergeld wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm trying to get Qemu 0.9.1 cross compiled for the ARM platform. >> >> Don't bother. Use SVN. > > Okay. I did this, and actually got a binary this time;-) > > But in the file tcg/arm/tcg-target.c, function tcg_out_goto (line 677), a > block of code commented out, and replaced by an tcg_abort(). Why has this been > done? It hasn't been tested because there's hope that it won't be needed. If you see TCG abort in that place it means that a branch to a place further away than 1 << 26 is being attempted and maybe this can be avoided by modifying arm.ld. > > If I replace the about with the outcommented code, qemu segfaults. So I guess > qemu support for target arm is currently broken? That's possible. Cheers