From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LFzRy-0003JJ-Dm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Dec 2008 18:17:06 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LFzRu-0003Fy-Hm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Dec 2008 18:17:05 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48946 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LFzRu-0003Fv-C0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Dec 2008 18:17:02 -0500 Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.240]:8476) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LFzRt-00070O-UK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Dec 2008 18:17:02 -0500 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id f25so3210972rvb.22 for ; Thu, 25 Dec 2008 15:17:01 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 00:17:01 +0100 From: "andrzej zaborowski" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] evdev_keycode_map In-Reply-To: <493FD5DD.2020704@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20081209224235.GA12529@kos.to> <20081210112845.GC22446@redhat.com> <493FD5DD.2020704@codemonkey.ws> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Dustin Kirkland 2008/12/10 Anthony Liguori : > Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >> >> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:42:35AM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote: >> >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 06:10:27PM -0500, Dustin Kirkland wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> I'm attaching a patch that we have applied to the qemu implementation >>>> inside of the kvm package in Ubuntu. >>>> >>> >>> Anyone know why this patch is still lingering? >>> >>> >>>> >>>> --- kvm-72+dfsg/qemu/configure 2008-07-27 08:20:10.000000000 -0500 >>>> +++ kvm-72+dfsg/qemu/configure 2008-09-24 16:04:28.036791147 -0500 >>>> @@ -1198,9 +1198,9 @@ if test "$sdl1" = "yes" ; then >>>> echo "#define CONFIG_SDL 1" >> $config_h >>>> echo "CONFIG_SDL=yes" >> $config_mak >>>> if test "$target_softmmu" = "no" -o "$static" = "yes"; then >>>> - echo "SDL_LIBS=$sdl_static_libs" >> $config_mak >>>> + echo "SDL_LIBS=-lX11 $sdl_static_libs" >> $config_mak >>>> else >>>> - echo "SDL_LIBS=`$sdl_config --libs`" >> $config_mak >>>> + echo "SDL_LIBS=-lX11 `$sdl_config --libs`" >> $config_mak >>>> fi >>>> >>> >>> These changes make the SDL code dependant on X ? This >>> would make compiling windows less trivial.. >>> >> >> It ought to be possible to just #ifdef out the bit of the code which >> checks for evdev on non-Linux, and just default to the existing mapping QEMU >> had. >> > > This is what's required for merging. SDL X11 support needs to be probed at > configure time, an appropriate #define needs to be added to config.h, and > then the detection code needs to be enabled conditionally based on that > #define. > > Otherwise, non-X11 SDL platforms will stop building which certainly isn't > acceptable. You can have X11 support compiled in and not use it, SDL can be compiled with >1 backends. Cheers