From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KvClS-0007Zz-Ne for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:15:18 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KvClR-0007Wh-1I for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:15:18 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36704 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KvClQ-0007WY-V5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:15:16 -0400 Received: from rn-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.170.189]:10283) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KvClQ-0001tc-PR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:15:16 -0400 Received: by rn-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id m61so26676rnd.8 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:15:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 10:15:15 -0500 From: "Hollis Blanchard" Sender: slightlyunconventional@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] TCG on PowerPC arch In-Reply-To: <08F1A495-DAB5-44CD-8993-F1F8CF4470CC@web.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <210736.85874.qm@web27202.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <08F1A495-DAB5-44CD-8993-F1F8CF4470CC@web.de> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: salvatorelionetti@yahoo.it On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Andreas F=E4rber = wrote: > > How did you actually use and test your eMac emulation? I assume you did n= ot > use a PReP Linux kernel for that? If you could provide some details, that > might help with testing the TCG conversion too. (Just in case there's any confusion, EMAC is the name for the ethernet controller on IBM's 405- and 440-based SoCs, not to be confused with Apple's eMac product.) Salvatore, did you use a 405 Linux kernel with the EMAC driver to test this patch? If so, how exactly did you boot? What did you do for firmware? -Hollis