From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MYqK9-0008Ud-NJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Aug 2009 19:55:13 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MYqK4-0008Rx-NU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Aug 2009 19:55:12 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45844 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MYqK4-0008Rc-6U for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Aug 2009 19:55:08 -0400 Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.175]:6542) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MYqK2-0000Oy-6D for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Aug 2009 19:55:06 -0400 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 26so132539wfd.4 for ; Wed, 05 Aug 2009 16:55:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: slightlyunconventional@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <200908042105.57784.rob@landley.net> References: <200907071748.03623.rob@landley.net> <20090802100429.GO3732@hall.aurel32.net> <200908042105.57784.rob@landley.net> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 16:55:03 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Powerpc regressions? From: Hollis Blanchard Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Rob Landley Cc: Alexander Graf , Aurelien Jarno , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Rob Landley wrote: > On Sunday 02 August 2009 07:25:45 Alexander Graf wrote: >> On 02.08.2009, at 12:04, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >> > >> > I think using console=3DttyPZ0 which is the serial port name on PowerP= C >> > will give you more details. > > Yup, that gave me boot messages. =A0Thanks. > > Huh. =A0It used ttyS0 with the other .config (I at least got boot message= s), I > wonder why that changed? =A0(Just confirmed that this .config has the dri= ver for a > 16550a built in. =A0And the name "ttyS0" for the first serial device is > presumably about as genric as using eth1 for the first wired ethernet > device...) Sadly no. This was a subject of much debate, but Russel King insisted that ttyS would be used only for NS16550-style UARTs. In the past, the pmac_zilog driver hijacked that major/minor anyways, but it was later changed to use its own major/minor (and ttyPZ). (I don't remember when that change occurred, but it should be pretty easy for you to find out if you care.) -Hollis