From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DDuzY-0007ZD-Ms for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 20:49:05 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DDuzQ-0007Vk-QT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 20:48:57 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DDuzQ-0007UW-F2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 20:48:56 -0500 Received: from [64.233.184.203] (helo=wproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DDuf4-0001OH-EP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 20:27:54 -0500 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 67so70196wri for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:27:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:27:52 -0600 From: Ryan Rempel Subject: Re: KQEMU on FreeBSD partially works. (Was: [Qemu-devel] Accelerator for FreeBSD?) In-Reply-To: <1111417053.397.7.camel@pcgem.xiphis.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <1111417053.397.7.camel@pcgem.xiphis.org> Reply-To: Ryan Rempel , qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Antony T Curtis Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 14:57:33 +0000, Antony T Curtis wrote: > On Sun, 2005-03-20 at 19:42 -0600, Ryan Rempel wrote: > > There is a reference here [1] to the possibility of porting the > > Accelerator to *BSD by porting a small "C stub". > > > > Is anyone working on this at the moment? > I have made some headway... The attached stub appears to work but in my > limited testing so far, it may be a bit unstable. The driver stub is for > FreeBSD 4 (tested on 4.9) and I may work on a 5.3+ one soon. Thanks! I would need one that works with 5.3 -- I'll take a look when I get a chance and see what I can figure out. When you say "a bit unstable", do you mean unstable for the guest OS or unstable for the host as well? Just curious ...