From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Me4Co-0001dc-UD
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 05:45:14 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Me4Cj-0001c1-Ek
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 05:45:13 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48274 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Me4Cj-0001bs-2M
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 05:45:09 -0400
Received: from mail-gx0-f211.google.com ([209.85.217.211]:45115)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <atar4qemu@googlemail.com>) id 1Me4Ci-0002nn-MY
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 05:45:08 -0400
Received: by gxk7 with SMTP id 7so6520852gxk.8
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 02:45:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <f43fc5580908190943y733cb56dvf35af9c9a325235a@mail.gmail.com>
References: <fb8d4f70908170352v20c53486lca45042cfdb22ebc@mail.gmail.com>
	<f43fc5580908171035l73924821n5b89a3066d8bd72c@mail.gmail.com>
	<fb8d4f70908190317qe2f1df8rd2cb02504d1406e8@mail.gmail.com>
	<f43fc5580908190943y733cb56dvf35af9c9a325235a@mail.gmail.com>
From: Artyom Tarasenko <atar4qemu@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:44:48 +0200
Message-ID: <fb8d4f70908200244lcf44fdfu5d89b67a089b8290@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: target-sparc/TODO
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

>> Particularly I'm interested if
>>
>> jmp =A0 =A0 %l1, %g4, %g0
>>
>> may behave other than on a real hw.
>
> No, if rd is %g0, the current PC will not be written anywhere (not by
> real HW either).

The reason I asked is the two following pieces of code work
differently on a real and emulated SS-5. On a real one spacel! does an
asi write, and spacel@ does an asi read, and under qemu  spacel! seems
to do nothing, and spacel@ returns its second parameter multiplied by
4. Both of them don't even try to call an [unimplemented] asi
operation, I've runned the tests with mmu and asi debug turned on.

Real SS-5:

ok 0 0 spacel@ .
Data Access Error
ok 0 20 spacel@ .
0
ok 12345678 0 20 spacel!
ok 0 20 spacel@ .
12345678
ok


qemu SS-5:

ok 0 0 spacel@ .
0
ok 0 20 spacel@ .
80
ok 12345678 0 20 spacel!
ok 0 20 spacel@ .
80
ok

I don't know sparc asm good enogh, but qemu behavior seems to be
logical: in the first case I see no store op, and there are shifts
which would multiply by 4:

ok see spacel!
code spacel!
ffd26e0c     ld      [%g7], %l2
ffd26e10     add     %g7, 4, %g7
ffd26e14     ld      [%g7], %l0
ffd26e18     add     %g7, 4, %g7
ffd26e1c     sll     %g4, 2, %g4
ffd26e20     call    ffd26e24
ffd26e24     add     %g0, 14, %l1

ok ffd26e24 dis
ffd26e24     add     %g0, 14, %l1
ffd26e28     add     %o7, %l1, %l1
ffd26e2c     jmp     %l1, %g4, %g0
ffd26e30     ba      ffd26f68
ok

ok see spacel@
code spacel@
ffd26830     ld      [%g7], %l0
ffd26834     add     %g7, 4, %g7
ffd26838     sll     %g4, 2, %g4
ffd2683c     call    ffd26840
ffd26840     add     %g0, 14, %l1

ok ffd26840 dis
ffd26840     add     %g0, 14, %l1
ffd26844     add     %o7, %l1, %l1
ffd26848     jmp     %l1, %g4, %g0
ffd2684c     ba      ffd26984


The code is identical on a real and emulated SS.

It must be the jump, which jumps differently on a real hw and under
qemu. Do you see from the code where the jump would jump to, or maybe
you have a suggestion how to check where the jump jumps to on the real
hw?