qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Artyom Tarasenko <atar4qemu@googlemail.com>
To: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: target-sparc/TODO
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:40:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fb8d4f70908210540n10d0c512o74cbe7414e1938f8@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fb8d4f70908210258y59c72418i6cee44600f6d18ba@mail.gmail.com>

2009/8/21 Artyom Tarasenko <atar4qemu@googlemail.com>:
> 2009/8/20 Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>:
>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Artyom
>> Tarasenko<atar4qemu@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Particularly I'm interested if
>>>>>
>>>>> jmp     %l1, %g4, %g0
>>>>>
>>>>> may behave other than on a real hw.
>>>>
>>>> No, if rd is %g0, the current PC will not be written anywhere (not by
>>>> real HW either).
>>>
>>> The reason I asked is the two following pieces of code work
>>> differently on a real and emulated SS-5. On a real one spacel! does an
>>> asi write, and spacel@ does an asi read, and under qemu  spacel! seems
>>> to do nothing, and spacel@ returns its second parameter multiplied by
>>> 4. Both of them don't even try to call an [unimplemented] asi
>>> operation, I've runned the tests with mmu and asi debug turned on.
>>>
>>> Real SS-5:
>>>
>>> ok 0 0 spacel@ .
>>> Data Access Error
>>> ok 0 20 spacel@ .
>>> 0
>>> ok 12345678 0 20 spacel!
>>> ok 0 20 spacel@ .
>>> 12345678
>>> ok
>>>
>>>
>>> qemu SS-5:
>>>
>>> ok 0 0 spacel@ .
>>> 0
>>> ok 0 20 spacel@ .
>>> 80
>>> ok 12345678 0 20 spacel!
>>> ok 0 20 spacel@ .
>>> 80
>>> ok
>>>
>>> I don't know sparc asm good enogh, but qemu behavior seems to be
>>> logical: in the first case I see no store op, and there are shifts
>>> which would multiply by 4:
>>>
>>> ok see spacel!
>>> code spacel!
>>> ffd26e0c     ld      [%g7], %l2
>>> ffd26e10     add     %g7, 4, %g7
>>> ffd26e14     ld      [%g7], %l0
>>> ffd26e18     add     %g7, 4, %g7
>>> ffd26e1c     sll     %g4, 2, %g4
>>> ffd26e20     call    ffd26e24
>>> ffd26e24     add     %g0, 14, %l1
>>>
>>> ok ffd26e24 dis
>>> ffd26e24     add     %g0, 14, %l1
>>> ffd26e28     add     %o7, %l1, %l1
>>> ffd26e2c     jmp     %l1, %g4, %g0
>>> ffd26e30     ba      ffd26f68
>>> ok
>>>
>>> ok see spacel@
>>> code spacel@
>>> ffd26830     ld      [%g7], %l0
>>> ffd26834     add     %g7, 4, %g7
>>> ffd26838     sll     %g4, 2, %g4
>>> ffd2683c     call    ffd26840
>>> ffd26840     add     %g0, 14, %l1
>>>
>>> ok ffd26840 dis
>>> ffd26840     add     %g0, 14, %l1
>>> ffd26844     add     %o7, %l1, %l1
>>> ffd26848     jmp     %l1, %g4, %g0
>>> ffd2684c     ba      ffd26984
>>>
>>>
>>> The code is identical on a real and emulated SS.
>>>
>>> It must be the jump, which jumps differently on a real hw and under
>>> qemu. Do you see from the code where the jump would jump to, or maybe
>>> you have a suggestion how to check where the jump jumps to on the real
>>> hw?
>>
>> The target of the call instruction is also a delay slot instruction
>> for the call itself. Maybe this case is not handled correctly?
>
> Good idea! Don't know how to test it though.
>
> And what about "ba" in the delay slot of "jmp"? Is the correct
> behavior described somewhere? Would jump just be ignored? Whould it
> execute one instruction on jump destination and then branch? Would
> branch be ignored?

Page 55 of The SPARC v8 Architecture Manual
(http://www.sparc.org/standards/V8.pdf) describes this case
explicitly:
cpu should execute one instruction on the jump target and then branch.
 Is it what qemu currently does?

I guess gcc doesn't generate such constructs, so linux & Co wouldn't
notice if this behavior is not implemented as specified.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-21 12:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-17 10:52 [Qemu-devel] target-sparc/TODO Artyom Tarasenko
2009-08-17 17:35 ` [Qemu-devel] target-sparc/TODO Blue Swirl
2009-08-19 10:17   ` Artyom Tarasenko
2009-08-19 16:43     ` Blue Swirl
2009-08-20  9:44       ` Artyom Tarasenko
2009-08-20 19:15         ` Blue Swirl
2009-08-21  9:58           ` Artyom Tarasenko
2009-08-21 12:40             ` Artyom Tarasenko [this message]
2009-08-21 19:45               ` Blue Swirl
2009-08-21 21:01                 ` Artyom Tarasenko
2009-08-21 21:10                   ` Igor Kovalenko
2009-08-21 21:17                     ` Artyom Tarasenko
2009-08-22  6:51                   ` Blue Swirl
2009-08-22 12:40                     ` Artyom Tarasenko
2009-08-22 13:30                       ` Robert Reif
2009-08-22 17:25                         ` Artyom Tarasenko
2009-08-22 18:46                           ` Robert Reif
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-08-20 19:59 [Qemu-devel] target-sparc/TODO Artyom Tarasenko
2010-08-20 20:19 ` [Qemu-devel] target-sparc/TODO Blue Swirl

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fb8d4f70908210540n10d0c512o74cbe7414e1938f8@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=atar4qemu@googlemail.com \
    --cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).