From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MgeYs-0000YG-2V
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 08:58:42 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MgeYm-0000T6-HE
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 08:58:41 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47065 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MgeYm-0000Sd-6e
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 08:58:36 -0400
Received: from mail-yw0-f173.google.com ([209.85.211.173]:63619)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <atar4qemu@googlemail.com>) id 1MgeYl-0006QI-KL
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 08:58:35 -0400
Received: by ywh3 with SMTP id 3so1228468ywh.22
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 05:58:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Artyom Tarasenko <atar4qemu@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 14:58:14 +0200
Message-ID: <fb8d4f70908270558w168f899fr1972a1454c360dd8@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] sparc32 potential regression in
	513f789f6b187faf1fd533dc6972bbfa021c4381
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>, Robert Reif <reif@earthlink.net>

qemu-0.10.{5,6} start OBP tests with ss5/170 rom, and master doesn't.
I'm not sure if it is a real regression (don't know if a real ss5/170
would start these tests), but it definitely looks like a regression to
me.
It would be nice to have a way for starting OBP tests (ss5/170 is the
largest test set for SS machines I have seen).

The regression comes with the commit
513f789f6b187faf1fd533dc6972bbfa021c4381 "Use firmware configuration
instead of NVRAM".

Would it be possible to introduce a switch simulating old behavior?