From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NFrDh-000765-18 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 10:34:21 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NFrDc-0006yV-7b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 10:34:20 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55018 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NFrDc-0006yI-3H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 10:34:16 -0500 Received: from mail-yx0-f188.google.com ([209.85.210.188]:38410) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NFrDa-0005jB-Mj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 10:34:15 -0500 Received: by yxe26 with SMTP id 26so249724yxe.4 for ; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 07:34:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: Artyom Tarasenko Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 16:33:52 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Unclear committer situation Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org 2009/12/1 Alexander Graf : > Hi, > > Could someone with commit rights please stand up to feel responsible for > PPC? > > Usually, when I send a patch to qemu-devel, I know who to address to > increase chances of it getting committed. For kvm/vnc/block I just CC > Anthony, for Audio I just CC malc, etc. And who can increase chances of getting committed for a scsi-related patch? I sent a patch on November, the 10th (http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/38100/), and it looks like it was just ignored.